Category Archives: Vaccines

Roll Up, Roll Up – Part Two

vaccine courtTrusting the vaccine companies and their cohorts

The pharmaceutical companies want us to trust their vaccines and be happy to have them injected into our bodies and the bodies of our children. But they need to be more up front as to the problems they face producing them and the possible harm they could do. Part 1 is here.

The Vaccine Court

We all know that vaccines cause harm. Why else would there be a Vaccine Court? Many have tried and failed to get compensation for damage done to themselves or their children through this court. The process is stressful and nigh on impossibe to negotiate and special Attorneys have to be employed for any chance of a good outcome.

autismHas your child been damaged by a vaccine?

If your child has been damaged by a vaccine, you need to know how to collate evidence, as soon as a child is born. Hopefully, you will not have to use this evidence. Have a look at the Vaccine Court link above and take note. The process takes many years and it is no surprise that many give up out of frustration and disheartenment. It is only those who have a completely water tight case and have kept records of their child’s life, recording anything and everything that has occured since birth, who ever make it successfully through the process. Read on…

Corvelva tasked to analyse vaccines

So when this company Corvelva was commissioned to check up on the contents of vaccines, it was interesting to see how the analysis transpired. On December 13th 2018, Corvelva, an Italian scientific research group was tasked to test the contents of vaccines currently on the market. The result of their first test on Infanrix Hexa was released on December 16th.

Analysis of Infanrix Hexa – no antigens detected?

Infanrix HexaThis is a 6 in 1 vaccine by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). This vaccine is supposed to have the following antigens: Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertussis toxoids. Inactivated Poliomyelitis viral strains 1-2-3 and Hepatitis B surface antigen. Corvelva found none of these antigens in the vaccine. In other words no antibodies to the intended antigens would be created.

But traces of 65 chemicals found 

What they did find however, was traces of 65 chemical cross contaminants from other manufacturing lines, including unrecognisable macromolecules, chemical toxins, various free bacterial peptides which are potential allergens capable of inducing autoimmune reactions.

Released in 2000 but still being administered!

GSKA confidential GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) document, leaked to the press, exposed that within a two year period, a total of 36 infants died after receiving the 6-in-1 vaccine, Infanrix Hexa. Also, more than 1,700 were injured in the “clinical trial”  of this vaccine. (Note the date, way before Corvelva analysed the vaccine in 2018.) Many of the babies who died, passed away within the first few days of receiving the vaccine.  A total of three infants were reported to have died within hours of receiving the vaccine.

But it won’t happen to you or your child, will it?

But, of course, this won’t happen to you or your child will it. It always happens to someone else. By the way, this vaccine is injected into our children regularly. Here’s a vaccine schedule I found for Australia

How about Priorix Tetra?

Here’s another vaccine Corvelva tested with the results released on 23rd December 2018, This time it was the GSK MMRV Vaccine (Priorix Tetra). It was found to contain a massive amount of foreign viruses. None of which appear related to the supposed purpose of the vaccine itself.

Priorix TetraCORVELVA Experts wrote: “We have continued the investigation, both chemical and biological, on the Priorix Tetra, quadrivalent against measles, rubella, mumps and varicella and we have also found …Within the GlaxoSmithKline Priorix Tetra vaccine, Proteobacteria, Platyhelminthes and Nematoda worms, 10 other viruses to ssRNA, Microviridae (bacterial or phage viruses) and numerous retroviruses including endogenous human and avian retroviruses, avian viruses, human immunodeficiency and immunodeficiency virus of monkeys (fragments that if inserted into the database detect fragments of HIV and SIV), murine virus, horse infectious anemia virus, lymphoproliferative disease virus, Rous sarcoma virus. Other viruses like alphaendornavirus and hepatitis b virus, yeast virus.”

All of the above substances were detected in the GSK Vaccine Priorix Textra for Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella, which is again on the Australian Immunization Schedule for all children at 18 months of age. Germany and New Zealand also use one or both of these vaccines.

Will harmful ingredients drive the COVID-19 vaccine?

The short video below is an interview of Robert F Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree. Both of these amazing people are advocates of safe and efficient vaccines, with safety at the forefront. They are particulary concerned about the damage to children vaccinated with products that have not been sufficiently tested. Their anxiety about the fast tracked COVID-19 vaccine is obvious in this video. The also explain why they are so concerned.

Look what I found on the GOV.UK site:

Check out the GOV.UK page called Consultation document: changes to Human Medicine Regulations to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines” It is rather difficult to find, but here are a few sentences and paras….

Brits had until Friday 18th September 2020 to respond to these documents. It was published on 28th August 2020 and they expect the total population of the UK to read it and respond by 18th Sept? This government gets more stupid as time goes by!

“If the need arises, regulation 174, in its present form, could be used to authorise nationwide distribution and supply of an unlicensed COVID-19 vaccine (or treatment) in the UK, as well as other potential products.”

“Any decision to roll out mass vaccination programmes for unlicensed COVID-19 vaccines, or indeed any pandemic disease treatments, will be taken nationally, not by the individual companies manufacturing or marketing the product.

The current legal framework already recognises that if manufacturers or healthcare professionals are asked to supply an unlicensed medicine in response to a public health threat, it is unfair also to ask them to take responsibility for the consequences of the use of that medicine in the way that they normally would.”

“What regulation 345 does, therefore, is transpose into UK law a requirement of EU law that key actors in the medicines supply chain cannot generally be sued in the civil courts for the consequences resulting from the use of an unlicensed product, or a new use of a licensed product, that a national licensing authority is recommending in order to deal with certain specific health threats.”

covid-19 vaccineThe threat is not the virus, the threat is the government

It occurs to me that the only health threat we have here is our inept governments who are the puppets of Big Pharma and power hungry billionaires. How has it come to this? Countries’ economies in ruins, peoples lives in tatters, the vast majority of the population frightened to death, apart from being thoroughly confused.

We’re dying from ineptitude!

People are not dying from COVID-19, they’re dying from government mismanagements, knee-jerk reactions, ridiculous predictions, nonsensical compliances and leaving people to die instead of treating with a simple medication that’s been on the planet and on the WHO’s safe list for 65 years!  Here we are, just going along with everything they throw at us. Obediently following all the government’s stupid rules and insidiously having our freedoms eroded little by little. We are slowly slipping into a totalitarian state and subjugation.

A reminder!
Prof Didier Raoult
Professor Didier Raoult – World expert epidemiologist

Just to remind you, the chance of the average person dying from COVID-19 is – 0.0112%. In other words, the chance of the average person surviving COVID-19 is – 99.988%.  You’re more likely to die from a road traffic accident! To keep it in perspective, you do have a 15.9% chance of dying from Chronic Heart Disease! There’s hundreds of viruses on the planet and we live with them daily. When we come out of lockdowns, the virus is still there, what’s the point. Especially as we have a safe, cheap and effective treatment and prophylaxis for this virus. Check out the link to the video (in French, English sub-titles)

Prof. Didier Raoult says:

“Actually, from all respiratory infections it’s probably the easiest to treat…There is really no reason to get excited and rush to produce a vaccine…”

 

Roll Up, Roll Up!

roll up roll upRoll up, roll up, roll up your sleeves. You’ve been champing at the bit to be first in line for one of the new vaccines. Don’t worry, if you want it, you’ll get it no problem! You don’t have to be concerned with the safety issue either. The government has said on its webpage that the treatments are all completely safe.

Our trusted pharmaceutical industry?

Of course, the vaccine manufacturers will do exhaustive tests to make sure that you, the customer, will not be harmed by their wonderful life changing, obscenely profitable, vaccine. The vaccine that will get your life back to normal? Yes, I am being sarcastic, the lowest form of wit I know, but I am really exasperated by all the COVID hype and fear-mongering which is pushing people into considering a new fast tracked vaccine.

Coronavirus vaccine attempts all failed!
Sweden summer 2020
Swedes enjoying their 2020 summer 

Vaccine manufacturers have been trying to successfully produce a coronavirus vaccine for decades. All attempts have failed with some disastrous results.  Why risk vaccine damage. Why not instead, treat sufferers with one of the 3 safe and effective (unpatentable) treatments. Why not strive for natural herd immunity such as Sweden’s action plan which has brought them successfully through and out the other side, with minimum effects on their economy and their peoples’ sanity!

Anti-Vaxxer?

Those who don’t know me, will call me an anti-vaxxer! Thing is, I’m anti any treatment that has not been thoroughly safety tested, so if you want to call me an anti-vaxxer, that’s fine! But it’s not so much a problem with vaccines, it’s more to do with a problem with vaccine manufacturers, ie. the pharmaceutical industry and their consorts, most of which seem to be multi-millionaires or even billionaires. Why do you think they are so rich and powerful?

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 It went downhill after 1986

From the year 1986, things went seriously awry with vaccine production. Why? Well, the vaccine manufacturers were given complete immunity from being sued or brought to trial, if one of their vaccines caused death or damage to a recipient. This gave the pharmaceutical industry carte blanche to churn out vaccines without worrying about safety testing. By the late 1980s, the incidence of childhood illnesses started to rise at an alarming rate. Is this a coincidence?

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986

Despite vaccines being touted as completely safe with no serious side effects, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was also brought into force in 1986. It does seem odd that such an act has to be brought in to compensate those children damaged or killed by these completely safe vaccines.  It is a misnomer!

I do not trust the pharmaceutical industry

The reason I don’t trust the pharmaceutical industry is their modus operandi. The be all and end all of their business is to make huge profits. That’s OK in itself. Those in business need to make good profits. But for most of us, if something we produce causes harm or death to a customer, we would be devastated. Unfortunately, with the drug industry, the only thing that will devastate them is if their bottom line is in danger. Killing and maiming their customers is not a problem, especially if they can get away with it legally.

With vaccines, they do get away with it!

vaccine damageWith a vaccine, if it causes damage or death, no blame is laid at the door of the company that produced that vaccine. They get off scot-free. On the other hand, if they produce a product, other than a vaccine, which causes death or damage, they could be taken to court. Even so, not one person from the pharmaceutical company breaking the law, will be given a prison sentence. They will just get a hefty fine, which is nothing to a company which makes billions each year.

What punishment is given to those who kill?

If we kill someone, we will get a much deserved prison sentence and in some countries, the death sentence. If a pharmaceutical company kills thousands of people, they will get a fine. Is that right and just? Out of interest, here are the top 10 Pharmaceutical Companies by Revenue: (Beckers Hospital Review)

  1. Pfizer — $51.75 billion
  2. Roche — $50 billion
  3. Novartis — $47.45 billion
  4. Merck — $46.84 billion
  5. GlaxoSmithKline — $43.54 billion
  6. Johnson & Johnson — $42.1 billion
  7. AbbVie — $33.27 billion
  8. Sanofi — $27.77 billion
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb — $26.15 billion
  10. AstraZeneca — $23.57 billion
The progress of 6 of the COVID-19 vaccine front runners

Below, I have looked at 6 of the front runners for a possible COVID-19 vaccine. Also, there is some extra information on them which gives you an idea of their  trustworthiness.

moderna vaccine100% of Moderna participants suffered side effects

Bill Gates visibly struggled to manoeuver through the pointed questions posed by CBS about the safety of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (currently known only as mRNA-1273). This was recently found to cause systemic side effects in 80% of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram (mcg) dose. Side effects ranged from fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia or muscle pain (53%). After the second dose, 100% of participants in the 100-mcg group experienced side effects.

The highest dosage group…

In the highest dosage group, who received 250 mcg, 100% of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses. Three of the 14 participants (21%) in the 250-mcg group suffered “one or more severe events.” A severe event is explained here by the FDA.

Bill Gates stated, “None of the vaccines at this point appear like they’ll work with a single dose,”

He continued to say that “unbelievably big numbers” of doses were needed and predicted that 80% of the global population needs to be vaccinated. So yes, we’re talking about tens of billions of doses. I wonder how much money these billions of vaccines will make the pharmaceuticals and the already obscenely rich billionaires, especially if you need two doses to start and then a dose every year? What a money spinner – the rich get richer…

Pfizer’s progress with new vaccine

roll up roll upPfizer’s vaccine candidate – for now just called BNT162b1 was said to have – “elicited a robust immune response in participants, which increased with dose level and with a second dose”

This was according to a news release from the journal Nature, which published the trial data on Aug. 12. The new trial involved 45 healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 55. Half were randomly selected to get the vaccine at a low, medium or high dose, while the other half got a “dummy” placebo shot.

According to Nature, the shot was “generally well-tolerated,” although some recipients did have some transitory side effects such as soreness at the injection site, fatigue, headache, fever and sleep woes. Those tended to clear up within a week of vaccination, the researchers said. Do they know how the recipients will respond when given the wild virus I wonder?

How about Pfizer’s track record?

Should we worry that Pfizer has pled guilty to misbranding with intent to mislead and defraud and promoting a drug with dangerously high dosages. They were fined $2.3 billion.

pfizer fraud
Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion. Pfizer pled guilty to misbranding the painkiller Bextra with “the intent to defraud or mislead”, promoting the drug to treat acute pain at dosages the FDA had previously deemed dangerously high.

 

Then there’s Glaxo Smith Kline.

GSK COVID-19 vaccine development collaboration with Sanofi and Clover Bio pharmaceuticals begins clinical trials. Can we be given a GSK vaccine and be totally confident of its safety? I can find no news as to how their trials are progressing.

glaxo smith kline
GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) agreed to plead guilty and to pay $3 billion to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company’s unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices.

Surely, there’s no way, GSK will fail to report any safety data? But what if the vaccine is mandated and we’re all forced to have it without the rigorous testing that needs to be done with a new unproven vaccine. Especially one that may be mandated and fast tracked.  What if some of us become ill or die, from the effects of the new vaccine. If that happens, nobody could do anything about it. You can’t sue the vaccine makers. If you try the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP,) it is the government you’re suing. Those who are courageous enough to try have a really tough time.

We would have to just accept all deaths and damage because we gave up our human rights to refuse a possible harmful treatment for us, but more importantly for our precious babies and children.

The Astra Zeneca trial has got a problem…
astra zeneca fined
Pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca paid $520 million in fines to settle charges by the federal government that it illegally marketed the anti-psychotic drug Seroquel to children and elderly patients for uses not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

The Oxford AstraZeneca trials has been paused after a participant in Britain showed symptoms consistent with transverse myelitis, a rare neurological disease caused by inflammation of the spinal cord. But never mind, it’s only one person with a serious reaction. I think she’ll be out of hospital soon. Meanwhile here are 3 of Astra Zeneca’s illigal acts.

Astra Zeneca has been fined $355 million for Medicare fraud!

In 2010 AstraZeneca agreed to pay £505 million to British revenue authorities to resolve a dispute related to the company’s use of transfer pricing techniques to reduce its tax liability.

J & J Announces a Lead Vaccine Candidate for COVID-19
J & J
Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay a $2.2 billion fine to resolve criminal and civil allegations relating to the prescription drugs Risperdal, Invega and Natrecor. The government alleged that J&J promoted these drugs for uses not approved as safe and effective by the FDA, targeted elderly dementia patients in nursing homes, and paid kickbacks to physicians and to the nation’s largest long-term care pharmacy provider, Omnicare Inc. As part of the agreement, Johnson & Johnson admitted that it promoted Risperdal for treatment of psychotic symptoms in non-schizophrenic patients, although the drug was approved only to treat schizophrenia.

If you were an elderly patient or had elderly relatives, would you trust this company to look after you and your family after it was guilty of giving drugs ‘for uses not approved as safe and effective by the FDA, targeting elderly dementia patients in nursing homes’.

Merck leaps into COVID-19 development fray with vaccine drug deals

Merck & Co. has now started testing its experimental Covid-19 vaccine candidate V591 in healthy volunteers. The Phase 1 / 2 trial, which will take place in Belgium with 260 enrolled subjects, was reported by Merck on a government database and confirmed by the company, says the Wall Street Journal.

Merck fraud

Merck agreed to pay a fine of $950 million related to the illegal promotion of the painkiller Vioxx, which was withdrawn from the market in 2004 after studies found the drug increased the risk of heart attacks. The Vioxx scandal resulted in many thousands of deaths

Merck knew about the cardiac problems

It was proven that Merck knew about the problems of the drug causing heart attacks but chose to ignore it and license the drug anyway. Cardiologist Eric Topol of the Cleveland Clinic testified that drugmaker Merck had scientific evidence of Vioxx’s cardiac hazards as far back as 1999 — well before it pulled the drug from market in September 2004.

Part Two of Roll Up, Roll Up

In Part Two of this article I will reveal some of the problems that could occur with the production of a Coronavirus vaccine. You need to be extremely careful and sure that this vaccine will not damage you or your family. You can’t go back once it has been put into your body, so be informed and thoroughly aware. Know what questions to ask of those who administer this vaccine. Insist on a copy of the information leaflet, before you have the vaccination and read it thoroughly. I suspect it will not be offered to you unless you ask for it and even then, they may say there isn’t one!

CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Summary

The Vaccine FraudFor those who have not had the time to read the 6 parts of CDC – The Vaccine Fraud, I am doing a summary so you can take in the salient points.  I know how difficult it is for parents and carers to find information about vaccines, especially when they are only told one side of the story from pharmaceuticals, doctors and other medics. Continue reading CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Summary

CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Part 6

In the last part of this article, CDC – the vaccine fraud, I want to concentrate more on one of the most serious frauds that the CDC has been guilty of.  The fraud concerning the MMR vaccine and its connection to autism.  See Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

The film VAXXED – trailer

Continue reading CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Part 6