Monthly Archives: January 2018

CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Part 3

In CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Part 3, I want to talk about the vaccine court and how it works in favour of the defendant (The Government) and against you the plaintiff.  This is for US readers as the UK and Europe works in a slightly different way, not better just different!  See Part 1, Part 2Part 4, Part 5 of this article.

vaccine courtThe 1986 Vaccine Compensation Act

The US 1986 Vaccine Compensation Act put Health and Human Services (HHS) in charge of all vaccine safety studies and the agencies involved in the vaccine program as follows:

Health & Human Services (HHS) control:
      • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
      • Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)
      • Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
      • National Institutes of Health (NIH).

These agencies are all part of the vaccine program and have various mandates including:

  • Promoting vaccines
  • Scheduling vaccination programs
  • Defending vaccines in vaccine court
  • Making sure of vaccine safety.
Vaccine Safety

Vaccine safety is mandated by the Vaccine Compensation Act to make sure vaccines progressively get safer year on year.  There should be a task force to ensure that there are fewer adverse events with each vaccine that is passed for use in the public domain.  Where that task force is, I’m still looking!

What happens when you file a claim?

After finding a lawyer accomplished in vaccine court procedure, you file a claim in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).  This is no ordinary court.  There’s no judge, there’s no jury and the press isn’t allowed.  All filings are submitted under seal.

HHS SecretaryYou are suing the US government

When you do get injured, you do not sue the manufacturer, you sue the secretary of the HHS, who is one of the President’s cabinet, plus the agencies listed above, the FDA, CDC, HRSA and NIH.  In other words, you are suing your government who has the Department of Justice lawyers to fight its corner.  So these various agencies who are accountable to the HHS will be defending the vaccine that you are in court to sue.  How’s that for a conflict of interests!

They will say that you’re irrational, uneducated in medical matters, or words to that effect.  They will bring out their specialists and say you’re misinformed, don’t know what you’re talking about etc.. They will say the vaccine has not damaged you or your child and you cannot prove otherwise.

You have to fight without discovery

Your hands are tied because you have to fight without discovery which means you have no access to any research, any manufacturing processes, any documents about the vaccine, you can’t see any studies, letters, memos or emails which your defendant may have on the subject.  You cannot use any information relating to the vaccine or the administering of it or other cases where it may have been involved. You are going to court blind!

They will try to avoid compensating youVaccine Court

Your child may have died. Your child may be in a wheelchair for life or have autism or a neurological disease.  Whatever it is, they will do everything to stop you proving your case and apart from the immense stress you will be under, it will cost you a shedload of money.

This is the most likely outcome, if you are brave enough to go to the vaccine court but haven’t done your homework!  Despite all these obstacles, all the stress and heartache, all the time and effort, some have actually won their case, despite all odds.

Be diligent!

These parents have been astute enough to document everything that has happened to their child after a vaccination.  They have informed their medics of all adverse events and had it documented for future reference with all symptoms and times and dates they occured. Make sure it is on record at your doctors and be diligent with everything that happens to your child which you think is not normal.  Don’t forget to take a video and pictures of your healthy child before a vaccine.  If there are side effects, take another video and take plenty of pictures. This will help prove your case if you need to sue.

vaccine safetyBe aware of all known side effects

You have to do all the science to prove that the vaccine damaged your child, because they didn’t do it. Why didn’t they do it, because you would use it in the vaccine court and you would be able to beat the government and its agencies using their own science.

$3.7 billion proves vaccine damage

The fact that the US Vaccine Court has dished out over $3.7 billion in vaccine damage compensation is proof that vaccines can cause damage.  Otherwise there wouldn’t be a Vaccine Court.  This is despite the vigorous and bully tactics used by the court process to try and discredit, vilify and cast aspersions on the hapless parents.  They are just trying to gain compensation and monetary aid for them and their child’s damaged life. They deserve to be treated with respect and reverence for being those that are paying the price for the so called good of the majority.

Do right by those sacrificedCDC

If it is recognised that vaccines cause damage to some unfortunate youngsters, those children should be prioritized to be given an unlimited amount of support, monetary or otherwise to try and give some recompense to them and their parents for their injuries. They shouldn’t have to fight tooth and nail in a court to get what is morally and rightfully theirs.  What’s more, it should be the pharmaceuticals who foot all the bill because it is they who produce the vaccines and it is they who are gaining all the profits from those vaccines at the expense of the health of us and our children.

What about the UK?

I went onto the GOV.UK site and they have a Vaccine Damage Payment.  This is what it says: “If you’re severely disabled as a result of a vaccination against certain diseases, you could get a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000. This is called a Vaccine Damage Payment.”  If you don’t believe me, this is the link to the site.

You have to prove 60% disabled!
This child went blind after DTaP shot

What’s more, you need to prove at least a 60% disability to get this payment.  I don’t know about you but I find this payment an insult.  How far would this pittance of a payment go if your child is severely damaged as an infant and has to be looked after for the rest of their life.  That’s apart from the grief and torment you as parents will go through.  It is contemptible!

But to add insult to injury, a vaccine damage payment can “effect other benefits and entitlements”.  It beggars belief and I am ashamed to be British when my government treats its citizens like this and shows no remorse or moral fibre when dealing with the outcome of these terrible vaccine adverse side effects.

Why not our natural immunity?

What’s the idea of all these vaccinations anyway.  Why are we not relying on our own immune system, a system, if kept nourished and strong, that will protect us from most diseases.  When these diseases strike, our immune system gets stronger with each subsequent onslaught.  Natural immunity is by far the best way to protect us.  With manyimmunity vaccines, our immune system declines and weakens such as the African study in Part 1.  One dose of measles as a child and you will have immunity for your lifetime.

I can remember when we would have ‘measles parties’ for kids so that we all got immune from measles at a young age and did not succumb to the disease when older.  German measles was another one.  Getting girls immune from rubella was a sure fire way of preventing unwanted problems for future pregnancies.  How about chicken pox?  When a child came down with chicken pox, no one worried that their children would catch it too.  It was a childhood disease that strengthened their immune system.

Bombarded with Vaccines

Now, we are bombarded with various vaccines, many of which have a low efficacy, are of Vaccine Damagedubious toxic content and can actually weaken our immune system and allow other diseases to encroach on our immune deficient bodies.  This is particularly relavent to newborns and infants who don’t have a mature immune system until around 6 months.

So when will this end?  How many viruses and diseases will we drag out of the ether to find a vaccine for.  What about spurious conditions like ADD and ADHD which some contend have been brought into the modern world as new diseases which are in fact side effects of vaccines.  We don’t know this to be the case, but where is the research to prove it is not so!

Vaccine producers just want profits

Pharmaceutical drugs cause all kinds of problems.  We were not born with drugs in our bodies, why would we introduce them.  They hardly ever CURE a condition.  They may CONTROL it for a while until the body gives up trying to rid itself of these toxins.   What about all the other toxins and poisonous concoctions that are spewn into our atmosphere by the likes of Monsanto and other big chemical companies.  Why are we so complacent about being poisoned on a daily basis?

Ches PowerIn Part 4 of this article, we will look at the childhood schedule and how a vaccine passes its safety test, if it has one! Click here for Part 1, Part 2 and  Part 4 of this article.

CDC – The Vaccine Fraud – Part 2

autism coverupIn Part 2 of CDC – the vaccine fraud, I would like to remind you just how fraudulent the pharmaceutical industry is. This is why you should be so careful and do your homework, before you ingest any of the drugs or have any procedures that the pharmaceutical industry produce and that includes vaccinations.  For Part 1 click here  and for Part 3 click here, Part 4 click here, Part 5 click here.  But first some information about childhood diseases.

Childhood diseases

When I was a child, I had just the tuberculosis (BCG) vaccine and the smallpox vaccine? I’ve had the chicken pox, the measles and german measles.  I had these diseases just once when I was a child. I don’t need to be boosted to keep my anti-bodies up.  I will never get these diseases again because my immunity is strong.  I’ve never had a tetanus jab nor a diptheria or whooping cough (pertussis) vaccine.  My husband, who has actually worked with vaccines in a professional capacity, knows how they’re made and what goes into them.  He chooses not to have any vaccinations including the flu jab.  It is his choice, as it should always be yours.

Measles TruthMeasles

I have been looking at the GOV.UK website which give details of all the measles notifications and deaths in England and Wales between 1940 and 2016. The figures below show the percentage of those that died of the measles compared with the total number of those that contracted the disease:

1940 – 0.2% of those getting measles died (1 person in 478)
1950 – 0.06%                             ”                             ( 1 person in 1664)
1960 – 0.02%                             ”                             (1 person in 5141)
1970 – 0.014%                           ”                             (1 person in 7319)
1980 – 0.019%                           ”                             (1 person in 5364)
1990 – 0.0075%                        ”                              (1 person in 13302)
2000 – 0.042%                           ”                              (1 person in 2378)
2010 – ZERO                                                               (none died in 2010)
2016 – 0.06%                              ”                              (1 person in 1642)

Although 2010 was a good year with no deaths, 6 years on in 2016, the figure is back to that similar to the 1950 figure and is worse than the 1960, 1970 and 1980 figures.  The only anomoly is probably the 1940 figure which could be attributable to the war when many of the population were unhealthy and living on rations.

I do not think that giving our children the measles vaccine for all those years has really done us any favours.  Those whose child has had an adverse effect will surely agree.  Having a natural immunity from catching the disease is by far the best way and the immunity is for life with no boosting and introduction of toxins necessary.

Merck and mumps fraudMumps

Merck accused of stonewalling in mumps vaccine antitrust lawsuit.

Apart from yet another scandal about Merck’s fraudulent activity, I think this vaccine is of dubious efficacy as this lawsuit claims.

I’ve never had mumps but hubbie has.  In fact he said the whole family had it except just one of his brothers (he has 3).  He remembers his father being quite ill but the rest of the family were under the weather for around a week.

Mortality from mumps has always been very low with around 30 out of 10 million dying in 1901 with a steady decline to around 5 deaths in 1921, 3-4 in 1941 and just 1 death in 10 million in 1961.  I personally do not think this death rate warrants a vaccine.  As far as Merck is concerned it is worth it.  Profits tell them so!

Rubella (German Measles)

I had rubella when I was about 14 years old.  I wasn’t allowed out for a week once the rash appeared and it is at this time the disease is contagious.  I felt no effects from having the virus. Many people don’t even know they have it.  The problem with rubella is that it can be dangerous to an unborn child.  A fetus of less than 20 weeks is at risk of getting birth defects or the mother can suffer a miscarriage.

1 out of 3?

Out of the three, Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccines, I can only see a requirement for the Rubella vaccine.  I had Rubella at age 14 years and could easily have infected a pregnant women with the virus.  My mother though, knew that I had to be kept indoors for at least a week after the rash to ensure I was not contagious.  Perhaps being educated about it would be as effective and could avoid any infant having a serious reaction from the vaccine, that’s if it is the Rubella part of the vaccine that causes problems, we just don’t know.  No independent research to say Rubella is safe has been done.

MMR has obvious problems

The MMR vaccine has obviously got some serious problems associated with it and despite the powers that be insisting it is safe, it obviously isn’t, just ask a parent who’s child has been vaccine damaged.  Finding out why it affects some infants to the point of maiming them for life, is the most important independent scientific research necessary to be done now, for the sake of all our children.

Single vaccine is one way to go

Meanwhile, giving single vaccines could be a way forward whilst this research is being done.  If it were up to me, I would be scrapping the measles and mumps vaccine for starters, or at least making the single measles and mumps vaccine available to those who wanted it.

tetanusTetanus

Just a note about tetanus.  Spores of the bacterium that cause tetanus, Clostridium tetani, are found in soil, dust, saliva and animal faeces.  Because it is everywhere, we are continually being bombarded with these spores. It lives within us and is found on the surface of the body, in the mouth, in the gastro-intestinal tract, in house dust and clothing. This continuous contact with the bacteria, gives us a natural immunity and it is usually only the really sick, immune deficient or weakened person who will succumb to it.

Tetanus deaths have been declining steadily over the 20th century with death rates recorded as just 3.5 per 1 million people in 1947 down to 1 death in 50 million in 2007. I think it is a complete waste of money, but the pharmaceutical industry would disagree. They have raked in billions in profits with this vaccine.

You are only customers to big pharma

This massive industry is only interested in you and your family as customers, customers who produce massive profits for them.  Don’t think for one moment they are worried about your health.  When they do produce a drug that kills or maims, they will put up such a fight to try and discredit the victims, you wouldn’t believe.  They have no morals.

Some facts for you

From 1991 through 2015, a total of 373 settlements were reached between the federal and state governments and pharmaceutical manufacturers, for a total of $35.7 billion. Of these, 140 were federal settlements, for $31.9 billion.  233 were state settlements, for $3.8 billion. See the whole report.

KickbacksKickbacks

One of the most common forms of fraud by big pharma are kickbacks.  Kickbacks are rewards given to medical personnel and medical professionals to entice them to prescribe a particular pharmaceutical drug.  Examples are: cash, jewellery, free vacations, sponsored retreats, lavish gifts etc..  Because of this fraulent activity, it makes you took twice at your doctor and wonder if he/she is being rewarded to prescribe the drug you are being given.

GSK and Pfizer worst offenders

From 1991 through 2015, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer reached the most settlements (31 each) and paid the most in financial penalties — $7.9 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively —to the federal and state governments. Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Abbott, Eli Lilly, Teva, Schering-Plough, Novartis, and AstraZeneca also paid more than $1 billion in financial penalties. Thirty-one companies entered into repeat settlements with the federal government from 1991 through 2015, with Pfizer (11), Merck (nine), GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb (eight each) finalizing the most federal settlements.

GSK fraudGlaxo Smith Kline pleaded guilty to fraud

On 2nd July 2012, GSK pleaded guilty to criminal charges and agreed a $3 billion settlement, the largest health care fraud case in the US and the largest payment by a drug company.  Their violations included:

  • Criminal: Off-label promotion.
  • Failure to disclose safety data.
  • Civil: paying kickbacks to physicians.
  • Making false and misleading statements concerning the safety of Avandia.
  • Reporting false best prices.
  • Underpaying rebates owed under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program
What about Vaccines?vaccine safety

I’m sure most of you have no sympathy for these drug companies who flout the law at the expense of the lives and health of all of us.  But what about vaccines.  Why is it so many trust the safety and efficacy of vaccines, despite the public having no comeback when a vaccine damages them or their child and despite there being no studies proving that any of the vaccines are safe.

They have all broken the law!

Many of the above pharmaceutical companies produce vaccines, including those that have had lawsuits brought against them to the tune of billions of dollars. Do you actually trust these companies to do their best to keep their vaccines safe and effective, especially when we are putting these dubious chemicals into our children and they have no fear of being sued if they kill or maim your child?

The top 3 vaccine producers are…

GSK, Merck and Pfizer.  Remember Merck in Part 1… “we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…”.  Then there’s GlaxoSmithKline the biggest perpetrator of fraud with Pfizer coming in a close second.  Why didn’t the CEOs of these fraudulent companies get a jail sentence.  The courts would rather put a mother in prison whose only crime was to refuse to have her child vaccinated.  She was just trying to protect her infant from being injected with chemicals produced by criminal companies such as these three!

Ronald Reagan 1986Immunity given to vaccine industry in 1986

When big pharma threatened to withdraw from making vaccines because of the risks of them being sued, they lobbied the government of the day to get some kind of immunity against prosecution.  In November 1986, Ronald Reagan was pressurised into signing a law which gave vaccine manufacturers carte blanche to manufacturer any vaccine they wanted without any comeback if it didn’t work or worse, if it killed or maimed.  This is when the Vaccine Court was set up in the US.

No research, no problems, no comeback!

The only comeback big pharma has is if they find dangers or problems during their research and do not disclose them. They would then be liable.  So what do you think happens now?  Well, what happens is they don’t do any safety studies, that way nothing can be found to discredit them.  No research, no problems found, no comeback on them.

100s of new vaccines being produced!

The law gives big pharma no incentive to conduct studies.  They are liability free to market to nearly 80 million US children.  This gives an enormous incentive to develop more and more vaccines.  That is exactly what is happening with hundreds of new vaccines ready to flood the market.  Do we really need them all, or are we flooding our children’s bodies with unnecessary toxins which actually weaken their immune system, making it necessary to give regular boosters.

Gates FoundationIndia severs ties with Gates Foundation

India — On February 28, 2017, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s (BMGF) support of India’s immunization program will cease to exist after the government has moved to sever ties with the billionaire’s organization.  Citing a ‘conflict of interests’, however, according to the India Times, the Gates Foundation’s “ties” with pharmaceutical companies is part of the reason they shut the gate on BMGF.

We are too trusting

We are all too trusting of this massive industry which has fallen by the wayside regarding its morals, its fraudulent activity and its callous lack of care for those that pay through the nose for its drugs and procedures often with deadly results.  You would think this industry would acknowledge that some children will be affected by their vaccines and put up a trust fund to try and compensate somewhat.  But no, they are too greedy.  They just don’t care if some of their ‘customers’ become sick or die from their drugs.  In fact, they would prefer them to become sick so they can ‘control’ that sickness for life.  Are you on a drug for life?

Ches PowerNext week in Part 3

Learn about the vaccine court and how the public is at such a disadvantage if they choose to sue.  Who do they have to sue?  The government of course!  Click here for Part 1 and here for Part 3

CDC – The Vaccine Fraud

Robert De NiroHow many of you have been told by your government, your doctor, the FDA, the CDC, that vaccines are safe and effective?  Of course, the pharmaceutical industry are always touting the safety and efficacy of their products, but that’s to be expected, they’re all about making profits, which is at the top of their priority list. Click here for Part 2, Part 3Part 4, Part 5.

Where is the science to prove vaccines are safe?

All the authorities that deal with our health as well as the media, news agencies and certain eminent medical professionals, keep telling us that our extensive vaccine program is safe for our children.  Famous people such as Penn and Teller (magicians)
have been paid to tell you, in no uncertain terms, with swearing included, to get your children vaccinated.  Ironic that they are in the business of deceiving and tricking the public!

Perhaps Penn & Teller did the research?

Perhaps Penn and Teller have been privy to research that proves vaccines are safe and efficacious.  I for one would like to see this research and so would a multitude of other people, especially those whose child has been vaccine damaged.  There has been some research done by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) but it turned out to be fraudulent but we’ll get to that later.

Vioxx
Bully tactics by Merck

In an Australian court case regarding the killer drug Vioxx made by Merck, those doctors who criticised the drug were put on a Merck ‘hit list’  containing doctors names labelled “neutralise”, “neutralised” or “discredit” next to them.  An internal memo was also uncovered saying that any doctor who questioned the safety of Vioxx would have to be dealt with.  The email had these chilling words “we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…”   These are the bully tactics that force so many doctors to keep quiet and toe the line, when they see evidence to support an unsafe drug or vaccine.

Good doctors are being hunted

US children have 72 doses of vaccines given to them by the age of 18, and this is likely to go up year on year. Those airing their views about the safety of some of these vaccines, have been ridiculed, vilified, hunted down and struck off the medical register.  These medical professionals are not anti-science, they are not anti-vaccines, they just want research done to prove one way or the other the safety and efficacy of each vaccine that is produced.  Not to be awkward or contrary but to safeguard the health of our children, now and in the future.  These are the medical professionals who put the safety of children first, unlike the pharmaceuticals and government agencies.

I can show you the evidence

I can show you evidence that over 400 peer-reviewed scientific studies and research have been done by independent researchers which put into doubt the safety and efficacy of some vaccines.  These studies have no affiliations to the pharmaceutical industry.

evidenceWhere is their evidence?

Where is the research from the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA, the CDC and other governmental agencies to say to the contrary?  Independent researchers have done their job, how about the pharmaceuticals and the government doing theirs!

Woe betide you if you buck the trend

In many states of the US, it is the law that you must be vaccinated.  Your child can’t go to school unless they have all their vaccinations up to date.  Parents who do not want their child vaccinated have medics knocking at their door with vaccine kits.  Doctors are likely to strike you off their register if you don’t keep your vaccine schedule up to date. What does that say to you?  Does it say that vaccines must be absolutely safe and effective? Otherwise our government would not make vaccinations compulsory, right?  Well lets look at an example:

guinea bissauThe African Study

A study was done and accepted in January 2017.  The lead researcher, Dr Peter Aaby was involved in a vaccination program 30 years previously, in Guinea-Bissau in Africa.  Because of how the program was set up, around half of the children between 3 – 5 months were not vaccinated with the DTP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis). Dr Aaby thought this would be a good opportunity to do a retrospective study to find out how those infants who had the DTP vaccine had faired against those infants of 3 – 5 months who did not have the vaccine.

Conclusion of that study

The results were unexpected and shocking and I give below the conclusions of that study. You can find the full study here:

“DTP was associated with a 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.

It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.”

In appendix A of this study, the researchers brought into doubt the validity of the follow up  figures where those children who had not had their vaccination recorded, were classed as being “unvaccinated”.  This put a bias on the mortality rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, with the unvaccinated group appearing to have a higher mortality rate.  In other words, the data had been manipulated and massaged to make the DTP vaccine appear more effective. This is from Appendix A: “Such procedures give a misleading high mortality rate in the unvaccinated group, and the comparison of DTP-vaccinated survivors and “unvaccinated” children will therefore give a beneficial estimate for DTP”.

who's watchingWho’s watching over our children?

Who’s watching over our children as they go through their lives injected with 16 different vaccines in 72 doses. Our children are being surveilled, aren’t they?  What’s happening today with the US vaccination program? Do we have any surveillance programs monitoring any adverse effects from all these vaccinations?  Could what happened in Africa 30 years ago, be happening right now to our kids.  Is there a system in place to make sure that our children are safe from the effects of all the vaccines mandated in the US today?

Can we trust them?

Do you think our authorities are watching the mandatory program to monitor it’s safety?   Is each child put on a database detailing any adverse reactions they’ve had as they go through the mandatory childhood vaccine schedule?  Are you confident that the FDA, the CDC and other agencies are doing all they can to keep our children safe from vaccine damage?  Are you confident in the research being done to prove the efficacy and safety of all these vaccines?

Prof. Wakefield was trying to do his job!Dr Wakefield

Prof. Wakefield wasn’t confident and look what happened to him.  Remember the Merck email “we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…” This is what happened to this talented medical professional.  He was sought out and destroyed where he lived in the UK.  But it has all backfired for big pharma.  Prof. Wakefield is now a household name in the medical industry.  His story has rocked the world of vaccines and many ordinary people are beginning to realise that they have been duped, deceived, hoodwinked, mislead and who are suffering?  Our beautiful children, our precious future.

Are any of the 16 vaccines causing a similar effect like the MMR vaccine for example?

Only in 2017 did we find out that for the last 30 years we’ve been poisoning children around the world with a DTP vaccine.  How many other vaccines may be causing a similar effect that we don’t realise?  What about the MMR vaccine?

Safety research should be done by the pharmaceutical industry and then thoroughly checked and verified by our health agencies.  But why should big pharma do any research?  They are immune to being sued because of a law passed by Ronald Reagan in 1986. This gives big pharma protection against legal action once their vaccines reach the childhood vaccination schedule.  Who judges which vaccines should be put on this schedule? That question will be answered later and it is unbelievable!
side effect

What you’re not told

This image shows some of the side effects put into vaccine inserts which you never see.  Have you ever been given one of the vaccine inserts when your child is having their vaccinations? One of the conditions that stand out, which the industry and its followers says is not caused by vaccines, is autism!  Why is this even mentioned, when it is perported not to be a problem?

If you knew, what would you do?

Why are these possible side effects, admitted by the pharmaceutical industry, not relayed to you before your child is vaccinated.  If this list was shown to you, would you question the risk of vaccinating your child?  What if it is your child that comes down with one of these distressing illnesses?  A side effect that could maim your infant.  A side effect that you will have to fight tooth and nail to get compensation for and if you lose the case, apart from the stress, you will be footing the bill for your child’s care for all their life.  A side effect that in no way shape or form would be a fault of yours or your innocent child.

Ches PowerIn Part 2

In Part 2 of this article, we will look further into the corruption and fraud that has taken place in the name of drugs and vaccines.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

SIDS preventionSudden Infant Death Syndrome often known by the acronym SIDS must be one of the most devastating events that can happen to a family.  Parents immediately start to put blame on themselves, questioning their behaviour and wondering what they could have done differently.  This is an understandable reaction to this tragedy but with support of family and friends, a parent will hopefully come to realize that nothing could have been done and it’s not their fault. Continue reading Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Digital Pill Approved!

Abilify MyCiteMandatory Vaccines and now this!

In my last post I talked about mandatory vaccines and how the pharmaceuticals are taking over our health, not in a good way.  This post ‘digital pill approved’ informs the reader that the FDA has approved use of a pill which has a tracking sensor inside it to monitor the patient and make sure they don’t skip their medication!  The name – Abilify MyCite (aripiprazole pill with sensor). Continue reading Digital Pill Approved!