A 4th treatment?

wayback machineThere are 3 possible treatments for C-19, but wait…

April 18th 2013, an article found on the Wayback Machine:

Scientists fight deadly new coronavirus – Liz Szabo, USA TODAY 5 a.m. EDT April 18, 2013

The SARS-like coronavirus was first diagnosed in a patient from Qatar, and researchers may have found a treatment.

Scientists may have found a treatment for a deadly new coronavirus — which causes severe, acute respiratory symptoms — first diagnosed in a patient from Qatar in September.

The treatment, a combination of two already-approved antiviral drugs, has been tested so far only in cells in lab dishes, according to the study in Scientific Reports. But authors say they’re encouraged to have any data to offer doctors. The SARS-like virus has been diagnosed in 17 people and has killed 11 by causing severe pneumonia and sometimes kidney failure.

ribavirinScientists found that a combination of the antiviral drugs ribavirin and interferon-alpha 2b, can stop the virus from reproducing in lab-grown cells, says lead author Darryl Falzarano of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease’s lab in Hamilton, Mont.

So what does Dr Fauci say?

That’s particularly encouraging, because these drugs, now used to treat hepatitis C, are widely available, says Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the infectious-disease institute, which financed the research.

“We don’t have to start designing new drugs,” a process that takes years, Fauci says. “The next time someone comes into an emergency room in Qatar or Saudi Arabia, you would have drugs that are readily available. And at least you would have some data.”

But here’s what Dr Anthony Fauci continues to say, remember this is 2013:

Dr Anthony FauciEven though the treatment hasn’t gone through definitive trials, Fauci says, “if I were a physician in a hospital and someone were dying, rather than do nothing, you can see if these work.”


So why have so many died because there was ‘no treatment for this new disease’. Fauci says he would have tried this treatment to see if it would work. So why is he now making sure that no treatment, even if it’s a widely available cheap drug, is used on dying or sick patients or as a prophylaxis for front line workers? Was a viable treatment available way back in 2013?

Here is the full link if you want to read all of it: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/18/scientists-develop-possible-treatment-for-new-sars-like-virus/2091443/

Then I found this article dated August 5th 2005!

Virol J. 2005 Aug 22;2:69. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69.

chloroquineChloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

Martin J Vincent  1 , Eric BergeronSuzanne BenjannetBobbie R EricksonPierre E RollinThomas G KsiazekNabil G SeidahStuart T Nichol

PMID: 16115318 PMCID: PMC1232869 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

Free PMC article


Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.

Results: We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.   Remember this is 2005!
Here’s the link if you want to go into the article more deeply: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/

Chloroquine versus Hydroxychloroquine

Although chloroquine is an effective drug, it is known that hydroxychloroquine is much safer. It is, in fact, a drug that’s been around for 65 years and is on the WHO’s list of safe drugs. Here is an article explaining more

What about Ribavirin & Interferon?

So then I looked up to see if there was anything else about Ribavirin and Interferon-a2b  and look what I found dated May 15th 2014:  Here’s the link:   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24831606/

Ribavirin and interferon-α2b as primary and preventive treatment for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a preliminary report of two cases

Mohammed Khalid  1 , Fahad Al RabiahBasha KhanAbdullah Al MobeireekTaimur S ButtEid Al Mutairy


Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a newly recognized transmissible viral infection with high virulence and case fatality rates for which there is no currently defined primary treatment or prophylaxis. Saudi Arabia has the largest reported number of cases so far. Like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), MERS is caused by a coronavirus. Combination therapy with interferon-α2b and ribavirin has been used successfully as primary treatment and prophylaxis in SARS. Because of similarities between the two coronaviruses, treatment with ribavarin and interferon-α2b has been suggested as a potential therapy for MERS-CoV. Studies in animal models of MERS-CoV have shown the combination of ribavirin and interferon-α2b to be effective both as primary treatment and prophylaxis. In this report, we describe for the first time use of this combination as a primary treatment for a patient with MERS-CoV infection and as prophylaxis for his spouse and discuss its possible role.

Mers Outbreak 2013This map was reported on November 7th 2013 and for that day, here was the current MERS-CoV tally: Of 151 cases, there were 64 deaths (42.3%). In other words, 42.3% of known infected people died. Just a smidge different to C-19 which is currently killing 0.012% of the world population, with a 99.988% chance of the average person surviving. Why wasn’t the world shut down then? I would think a 42.3%  deathrate from 151 cases would justify it more than the deathrate we have for C-19! You’re more likely to die in a car accident than die from C-19!

Why are coronavirus treatments being hidden?

Why are these life saving treatments being vilified as being dangerous or even hidden. It’s as though the hierarchy don’t want us to know that these cheap treatments work.

What about the flu and other coronaviruses

What about other viruses such as flu and even the common cold? These are coronaviruses too! Could it possibly mean that we have effective treatments for some or even all coronaviruses? If you could take a known safe drug rather than have a flu or fast tracked covid jab, what would you do?

Think about it…

flu shotThink about it….what would happen to all those flu jabs if coronaviruses were treatable with simple, already on the market, cheap drugs. Drugs that will have far less side affects than any flu jab, millions have each year. How pleased would the pharmaceutical industry be if that came to fruition? Imagine getting symptoms of the flu or another virus and already having the remedy in your medicine cabinet! In some countries HCQ is so safe it is an over the counter drug. As well as that, zinc is an available supplement! Countries using HCQ have drastically lower mortality rates than countries not allowing HCQ, check for yourself!

Why are we putting up with it?

Why are we putting up with this rubbish, why aren’t the vulnerable being administered a prophylaxis to prevent getting the disease or one of these treatments for those who contract the disease. Why are our elderly and sick on indefinate house arrest, getting sicker, distressed, frightened and lonely with their immune systems declining. 

Here are the 4 possible treatments:
Paul Marik MD
Dr Paul Marik of MATH+ fame

Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, Azithromycin or Doxycycline
Ivermectin, Zinc, Doxycycline
Ribavirin and Interferon-α2b?  – Just for fun, I found yet another article on Ribavirin and Interferon-α2b

Out of these 4 possible treatments, the Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) seems the best bet, purely because of its ease of use. Treatment can be administered at home which is much more convenienct for doctors and patients. Also, this HCQ can be used as a prophylaxis which would be a good idea for doctors, nurses and care workers to keep them safe from infection.

For those who cannot get HCQ, you can use natural alternatives of Quercetin, Zinc, Vitamin C (ascorbic acid), melatonin and vitamin D3.  Here is an article explaining the benefits.

The fact that the HCQ and the Quercetin based treatments can be used as a prophylaxis, is indicative of the safety of these treatments. The doctors and other professionals who are advocating the use and the success of these treatments should convince you of the truth.

You are being lied to! Ask yourself why?

american front line doctorsFront line doctors are being silenced, vilified and their videos and articles banned. These brave doctors, numbers of which are growing exponentially, are the real doctors, those that can’t be bought by the hierarchy. Those that risk losing their jobs and many of them have already, because they will not betray their patients.

There’s going to be a reckoning!

When this all comes to light, that governments, pharmaceuticals and those intent on ruling the masses, have deliberately withheld treatment, what will the public think. How will the relatives of those who have died, unnecessarily and often alone, feel. It is tantamount to malpractice at best and murder at worst. Who will be judged to have caused these medical, economical and personal disasters? Is it the virus that’s ruined the world, or is it the elitist hierarchy.

Spread the word!

A 4th Treatment?
Article Name
A 4th Treatment?
An already used drug, may have been discovered back in 2005 to treat coronaviruses. Why has this possible effective treatment not been pursued
Publisher Name
Publisher Logo

16 thoughts on “A 4th treatment?

  1. Hi Chez this is really valuable information you have shared here. I appreceat the work you are doing we need more people like you to get the word out there. Researching is very hard to do because you come across so many opinions. But I have come across like minded researchers that are willing to go the extra mile and you are in this catagory. I am sure your work is apreciated by many. Always a better way Linda

    1. Hi there Linda and thank you very much for your encouraging words. Yes, researching is a minefield, purely because there is so much bogus or fraudulent information being touted. You can no longer trust research done by the pharmaceutical industry. You have to look for independent researchers and doctors.

      As you seem particularly interested in what’s going on with COVID, have a look at this open letter from Belgian doctors and health professionals. For those who have trouble getting their head around all the information and getting somewhat confused because of it, this rather long letter explains a lot. Also, as most people are ‘in love’ with their doctors, who are after all completely controlled by the ‘industry’, they will be more open to believing what they say and perhaps may start to realise this debacle needs to be ceased. We all need to get back the the ‘old’ normal and get on with our lives.

      Out of interest, up ’till now the signatories of the Belgian open letter comprise of: 556 medical doctors, 1,624 medically trained health professionals and 11,610 citizens.

      1. I hear you been there done that. it is a long hard road one that not many people follow. But keep plugging away at it, your voice is a valid instrument in the hands of the Father. I have been plugging away at it for a long time also. But of late I have stepped back and have found many like-minded souls like you. Commenting is just important just to let you know that there are still many that are in this line of work and you are not alone.
        Sometimes we have to step back and take a breather where there is crap you will find more crap. Some times it seems we are not getting heard but that will change Lovelight to you, I left it on HIG’s the same aplays to you

  2. It is both disheartening to see this post here as much as it is really alarming too. Why on earth would they allow people to die from the virus when it can be easily treated and can be overlooked easily too. However. Due to the gains of the pharmaceutical industry capitalist, all these have been shielded away from us. Seriously, I am very delighted to see this and I will share this with people I know too

    1. Hi Nath, I’m afraid the answer is money which, of course, gives power! There is no money in using a drug that is out of patent and is cheap to produce. It is important to share, thank you very much for doing so. The public at large really need to know what’s going on. If we carry on letting our freedoms be taken away from us so insidiously, we will land up having no say in our future at all. Knowledge is strength and there’s strength in numbers. Trouble is the truth is being hidden and we need it out in the open. 

  3. It’s good that you shared this article here, a lot of people out there still don’t know what the Corona virus is o the extent, they just know it’s a deadly disease. It’s good to know about how it started and when the first treatment was. I think a lot more effort is needed to see through the complete treatment.

    1. Hi Bruce, yes the virus needs to be treated with respect but we live with hundreds of viruses every day. You cannot hide away from a virus and in this case, it is not necessary to be frightened and lock ourselves up. These treatments have been around for decades and are known to be safe after so many years of use. As the expert Prof. Didier Raoult said: “Actually, from all respiratory infections it’s probably the easiest to treat…  There is really no reason to get excited and rush to produce a vaccine…”

      Didier Raoult is a French physician and microbiologist specializing in infectious diseases. In 1984, Raoult created the Rickettsia Unit at Aix-Marseille University. He also teaches infectious diseases in the Faculty of Medicine of Aix-Marseille University.

  4. This is a great read! My opinion in the matter is that hydroxychloroquine is now prescribed loosely and needs more evaluation of prescribing. As pharmacy tech I had a customer that got his dentist to prescribe a large amount and when his insurance didn’t pay for it we questioned his usage on it for prior authorization. We were told none of our business why he was taking it. I think is good idea for Covid19 but I personally would hope doctors would take more responsibility in prescribing properly as the wrong patients could end up with a heart rhythm condition.  On the flip side this drug is used for primarily for Lupus and in beginning of Covid19 created a short supply for Lupus patients struggling to get their medication.

    1. Hi there CJ and thanks for reading the somewhat lengthy post. In those countries that have HCQ over the counter, the incidence of death from C-19 is much reduced. For the rest of us, we can’t get it at all unless we suffer from those diseases that it is usually prescribed for, as you said.  

      For a prophylaxis or because someone has Covid, it is not readily prescribed in the UK.  Medics who try and buck the trend and not follow protocol will find their licences pulled, unless they are independent physicians. 

      As for the heart rhythm condition, the so called researchers who said it causes heart problems gave the drugs in massive overdoses and did not follow the recipe of those who previously cured their patients without any side effects. 

      Then there was the Lancet research which was found to be completely fraudulent. The Lancet took it down, apologising profusely for letting it through without checking it. There is a lot of fraud afoot and we need to be vigilent and make sure what we are being told is the truth. I have found out many lies and it does not bode well. The goal of the pharmaceuticals, governments and elitist billionaires is to mandate the new C-19 jab worldwide. For those who refuse to have the mandatory treatment, their lives will be curtailed and their freedoms slowly diminished. Do your own research and find this out for yourself. 

  5. I’m really ticked off, because having a treatment that can cure the COVID-19 and having professionals go against it, is really uncalled for. I did not trust what Dr. Fauci said many times during the live press conference, because I know who he is and who has been working with. Doctors are supposed to save lives, not hinder citizens from getting the proper treatment.

    1. I quite agree with you Eugene, it is really unpleasant to think doctors are withholding these treatments and people are dying because of it. What we need to realise is that doctors and nurses are scared too. Not necessarily of the virus, but of losing their jobs if they don’t follow protocol and toe the party line. 

      Those of us who have already lost our jobs, through no fault of our own, know the desperate feeling when your livelihood is gone and you’re wondering how to feed your family. Depression sets in, to the point of some committing suicide. People are desperate and that is what the hierarchy want. They want us all gagging for the new fast tracked C-19 vaccine. You really need to research this vaccine, looking at independent researchers, not government mouthpieces. The Moderna vaccine is a good place to start!

  6. Hello there, thanks for the great information you have shared with us all. The corona virus has been really deadly and many people are suffering in different ways because of it. Seeing this detail I wonder how the vaccines found have been out to us but this article has given me clarity and I love your honesty here. I’ll do well to share with others 

    1. Thanks for your comment Justin and I sincerely hope you will continue to research about this virus for yourself. You will be surprised how much of the information given to you by the MSM and your government is actually not always true. Knowing that a vaccine is what governments want to mandate and knowing the $billions in profits all those involved in the vaccines will gain, may make you think twice as to why information of known treatments are being withheld!

  7. There’s is a very nice post and I am happy that you can tell me about this 4th treatment that you have mentioned here. I’m happy that you can talk about it and also tell me so much about the treatment of the Corona virus too. This is good stuff and it is also good to learn more about it too. The terms you used are quite ambiguous though with these terms that are all related to the the health industry.

    1. Hi Suz and thanks for your input. Yes, I’m afraid that sometimes people are not sure about the terms used but I need to give you the correct terms which you can then research for yourself. That’s the way we learn and your own research is the best way to digest the information. Keep at it Suz and make sure you keep yourself well informed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *