Roll Up, Roll Up – Part Two

vaccine courtTrusting the vaccine companies and their cohorts

The pharmaceutical companies want us to trust their vaccines and be happy to have them injected into our bodies and the bodies of our children. But they need to be more up front as to the problems they face producing them and the possible harm they could do. Part 1 is here.

The Vaccine Court

We all know that vaccines cause harm. Why else would there be a Vaccine Court? Many have tried and failed to get compensation for damage done to themselves or their children through this court. The process is stressful and nigh on impossibe to negotiate and special Attorneys have to be employed for any chance of a good outcome.

autismHas your child been damaged by a vaccine?

If your child has been damaged by a vaccine, you need to know how to collate evidence, as soon as a child is born. Hopefully, you will not have to use this evidence. Have a look at the Vaccine Court link above and take note. The process takes many years and it is no surprise that many give up out of frustration and disheartenment. It is only those who have a completely water tight case and have kept records of their child’s life, recording anything and everything that has occured since birth, who ever make it successfully through the process. Read on…

Corvelva tasked to analyse vaccines

So when this company Corvelva was commissioned to check up on the contents of vaccines, it was interesting to see how the analysis transpired. On December 13th 2018, Corvelva, an Italian scientific research group was tasked to test the contents of vaccines currently on the market. The result of their first test on Infanrix Hexa was released on December 16th.

Analysis of Infanrix Hexa – no antigens detected?

Infanrix HexaThis is a 6 in 1 vaccine by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). This vaccine is supposed to have the following antigens: Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertussis toxoids. Inactivated Poliomyelitis viral strains 1-2-3 and Hepatitis B surface antigen. Corvelva found none of these antigens in the vaccine. In other words no antibodies to the intended antigens would be created.

But traces of 65 chemicals found 

What they did find however, was traces of 65 chemical cross contaminants from other manufacturing lines, including unrecognisable macromolecules, chemical toxins, various free bacterial peptides which are potential allergens capable of inducing autoimmune reactions.

Released in 2000 but still being administered!

GSKA confidential GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) document, leaked to the press, exposed that within a two year period, a total of 36 infants died after receiving the 6-in-1 vaccine, Infanrix Hexa. Also, more than 1,700 were injured in the “clinical trial”  of this vaccine. (Note the date, way before Corvelva analysed the vaccine in 2018.) Many of the babies who died, passed away within the first few days of receiving the vaccine.  A total of three infants were reported to have died within hours of receiving the vaccine.

But it won’t happen to you or your child, will it?

But, of course, this won’t happen to you or your child will it. It always happens to someone else. By the way, this vaccine is injected into our children regularly. Here’s a vaccine schedule I found for Australia

How about Priorix Tetra?

Here’s another vaccine Corvelva tested with the results released on 23rd December 2018, This time it was the GSK MMRV Vaccine (Priorix Tetra). It was found to contain a massive amount of foreign viruses. None of which appear related to the supposed purpose of the vaccine itself.

Priorix TetraCORVELVA Experts wrote: “We have continued the investigation, both chemical and biological, on the Priorix Tetra, quadrivalent against measles, rubella, mumps and varicella and we have also found …Within the GlaxoSmithKline Priorix Tetra vaccine, Proteobacteria, Platyhelminthes and Nematoda worms, 10 other viruses to ssRNA, Microviridae (bacterial or phage viruses) and numerous retroviruses including endogenous human and avian retroviruses, avian viruses, human immunodeficiency and immunodeficiency virus of monkeys (fragments that if inserted into the database detect fragments of HIV and SIV), murine virus, horse infectious anemia virus, lymphoproliferative disease virus, Rous sarcoma virus. Other viruses like alphaendornavirus and hepatitis b virus, yeast virus.”

All of the above substances were detected in the GSK Vaccine Priorix Textra for Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella, which is again on the Australian Immunization Schedule for all children at 18 months of age. Germany and New Zealand also use one or both of these vaccines.

Will harmful ingredients drive the COVID-19 vaccine?

The short video below is an interview of Robert F Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree. Both of these amazing people are advocates of safe and efficient vaccines, with safety at the forefront. They are particulary concerned about the damage to children vaccinated with products that have not been sufficiently tested. Their anxiety about the fast tracked COVID-19 vaccine is obvious in this video. The also explain why they are so concerned.

Look what I found on the GOV.UK site:

Check out the GOV.UK page called Consultation document: changes to Human Medicine Regulations to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines” It is rather difficult to find, but here are a few sentences and paras….

Brits had until Friday 18th September 2020 to respond to these documents. It was published on 28th August 2020 and they expect the total population of the UK to read it and respond by 18th Sept? This government gets more stupid as time goes by!

“If the need arises, regulation 174, in its present form, could be used to authorise nationwide distribution and supply of an unlicensed COVID-19 vaccine (or treatment) in the UK, as well as other potential products.”

“Any decision to roll out mass vaccination programmes for unlicensed COVID-19 vaccines, or indeed any pandemic disease treatments, will be taken nationally, not by the individual companies manufacturing or marketing the product.

The current legal framework already recognises that if manufacturers or healthcare professionals are asked to supply an unlicensed medicine in response to a public health threat, it is unfair also to ask them to take responsibility for the consequences of the use of that medicine in the way that they normally would.”

“What regulation 345 does, therefore, is transpose into UK law a requirement of EU law that key actors in the medicines supply chain cannot generally be sued in the civil courts for the consequences resulting from the use of an unlicensed product, or a new use of a licensed product, that a national licensing authority is recommending in order to deal with certain specific health threats.”

covid-19 vaccineThe threat is not the virus, the threat is the government

It occurs to me that the only health threat we have here is our inept governments who are the puppets of Big Pharma and power hungry billionaires. How has it come to this? Countries’ economies in ruins, peoples lives in tatters, the vast majority of the population frightened to death, apart from being thoroughly confused.

We’re dying from ineptitude!

People are not dying from COVID-19, they’re dying from government mismanagements, knee-jerk reactions, ridiculous predictions, nonsensical compliances and leaving people to die instead of treating with a simple medication that’s been on the planet and on the WHO’s safe list for 65 years!  Here we are, just going along with everything they throw at us. Obediently following all the government’s stupid rules and insidiously having our freedoms eroded little by little. We are slowly slipping into a totalitarian state and subjugation.

A reminder!
Prof Didier Raoult
Professor Didier Raoult – World expert epidemiologist

Just to remind you, the chance of the average person dying from COVID-19 is – 0.0112%. In other words, the chance of the average person surviving COVID-19 is – 99.988%.  You’re more likely to die from a road traffic accident! To keep it in perspective, you do have a 15.9% chance of dying from Chronic Heart Disease! There’s hundreds of viruses on the planet and we live with them daily. When we come out of lockdowns, the virus is still there, what’s the point. Especially as we have a safe, cheap and effective treatment and prophylaxis for this virus. Check out the link to the video (in French, English sub-titles)

Prof. Didier Raoult says:

“Actually, from all respiratory infections it’s probably the easiest to treat…There is really no reason to get excited and rush to produce a vaccine…”


Spread the word!

Roll Up, Roll Up - Part Two
Article Name
Roll Up, Roll Up - Part Two
Do you trust the vaccine companies and their cohorts? They need more extensive safety testing and be up front about what can go wrong.
Publisher Name
Publisher Logo

6 thoughts on “Roll Up, Roll Up – Part Two

  1. Hello There, Thanks for sharing this wonderful article, there are some vital nutrients/elements that are useful to the body, but most of us lacks the knowledge of this, take for example the benefit of magnesium to the body. Some vaccines can be harmful but the lack of knowledge of this is what leads to most  f Xthe health issues we face after using such vaccines.

    1. Hello again Justin and thanks for reading part 2 of roll up roll up. I remember your comment on Part 1. You were hopeful in your last comment that the best comes out of it. We are all hopeful that we will come through this but we must also be aware of those that are not particularly bothered about the welfare of the public, especially as they will have no comeback if their product damages or kills. Vaccines have caused so much damage, much of which is hidden. 

      You must be knowledgeable and well informed of the how, what, with, when, why and who of vaccines. How vaccines are produced and administered and how they can damage the recipient. What is in the vaccine and is any of the recipe dangerous or toxic. With what other vaccines or viruses could this new vaccine react with. If the vaccine causes harm, when is this likely to happen, immediately or in months or years down the line. Why is this vaccine being pushed so much, could it be anything to do with profits. Who are producing the vaccines and can they be trusted.

  2. Wow, a post with loads and loads of terms that I can’t get my head around bit I guess you’re telling me here about vaccines and I even heard that many parents today are beginning to reject the vaccine for the kids because I read somewhere that the vaccines we took as kids is what causes us to fall sick. There has Ben many conspiracies but the fact still remains that something is wrong with vaccines and we need the Court.

    1. Hi again Suz, I also remember your comment from The 4th Treatment article. You mentioned then that the terms were rather heavy going, but if you do your own research you will soon ‘come to terms’ with the terms. 

      But, if you let me know what is tricky for you to get your head around, I will try and elaborate. Get back to me if you want. I always answer my comments!

      By your input, it would appear that you or someone you know has been sick, possibly because of vaccine damage. If that’s so, then you really need to take time out to find out more. The National Vaccine Information Centre (NVIC) gives masses of information, particularly on childhood vaccines

  3. Wow! So much useful information here and this arguably is the best information I have come across online this month. You have exposed a lot of things that most of us would have bypassed as just the ordinary qjd this is really great that you are bringing them to us here. Surely a very worthy one and I have bookmarked this here.

    1. Hi there Nath, I remember you have posted comments before. You are obviously interested in the subject and that’s good, especially as it directly impacts on your life and the lives of your loved ones. I also note that you are looking around for information ie. ‘I have come across online this month.’ You are one of those that can make a difference. Sharing articles which strike a chord with you is the best service you can do for others. 

      It is a crying shame that so many have difficulty with the science, especially when there is so much duff information out there. Many are taken in with the lies. There is one way to check and see if the information found is likely to be valid. That is, is the site you find the info on heavily monetised? If the site is full of adverts selling goods, then look further and see if the goods relate entirely to the niche subject of that site.

      If the site is riddled with adverts on all kinds of subjects, you know that the site owner is using the site for monetary purposes. This isn’t bad, everyone needs to make a living, but a site that is just for monetary purposes can be infiltrated with information that makes profits without necessarily telling the real truth.

      I used to have a few ads on my site and despite them being about magnesium, vitamin C and other useful nutrients for health, I decided to delete them all. I just didn’t want anyone to think I was in this for the money. I am in this to help and inform and there are plenty of other sites doing the same. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *