Informed Consent

This is a warning for those who find themselves in hospital and testing positive for Covid-19.  You may be offered a treatment, or even be given a treatment without knowing it, so beware! You should refuse any drug until such time you are properly informed about the pros and cons of the treatment. You can also ask for an alternative treatment of your choice, one that you already know is safe and effective with minimal ADEs (Adverse Drug Events.) If possible, have a relative or advocate with you at all times, so they can speak on your behalf. Contact the hospital before you arrive to ask for advocacy information, some have their own advocates in situ. It’s your body, your choice!

What is Remdesivir (Veklury)?

Remdesivir is an antiviral drug made by a company known as Gilead Sciences Inc. It is a protocol pushed by USA’s Dr Fauci. In the US, it is also incentivised which means when hospitals use the Remdesivir protocol, they receive massive incentives up to half a million dollars for each patient who receives the full protocol. This drug is also the recommended treatment for Covid-19 patients in the UK.

Guideline for the use of Remdesivir

Here is a guideline for the use of Remdesivir in the UK:  “SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by PCR or in the absence of a confirmed virological  diagnosis, when the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) have a high level of confidence that COVID-19 is the most likely diagnosis based on clinical and radiological features.”

In other words, if there isn’t a confirmed diagnosis, medics can decide for themselves! This accounts for mistakes made when patients are treated for Covid-19 but are not infected! When symptoms of Covid are the same as symptoms for the flu or even a cold, this lends itself to a plethora of mistakes including mis-diagnosis!

Pushing Remdesivir with Incentives

These incentives have caused a scandal in the US with medics and hospital administrators being accused of pushing the treatment to gain the monetary rewards. This despite Remdesivir being pulled from research trials because it was shown to be dangerous. Here’s one of the posts about it:

“Hospitals have been paid by the government millions of dollars over the last two and a half years to carry out the COVID “covered measures” protocols that have become death protocols for untold thousands of Americans. These government incentives paid to hospitals prevented patients from being treated with older, safer antiviral and other medicines, while patients were coerced — even against their will — to take remdesivir that had been known to damage the lungs and kidneys, and in earlier trials against Ebola, had to be withdrawn because the mortality rate with remdesivir was over 53%.”  

Adverse Drug Events due to Remdesivir

The particular trial in question was a randomised trial conducted during an Ebola outbreak.  Each of nearly 700 patients were given 1 of 4 drugs under trial. The 4 drugs were ZMapp (a triple monoclonal antibody), MAb114 (a single human monoclonal antibody derived from an Ebola survivor), REGN-EB3 (a mixture of three human immunoglobulin G1 [IgG1] monoclonal antibodies) and intravenous remdesivir. The average age of the recipients was 29 years. 56% were women (6% pregnant). When an interim analysis was performed, the trial was halted.  At day 28, mortality rates were: Remdesivir – 53.1%, ZMapp – 49.7%, MAb114 – 35.1%, REGN-EB3 – 33.5%

 The WHO Database of Remdesivir’s ADEs

More damning evidence of this drug was the Adverse Drug Events suspected to be caused by remdesivir reported to the WHO database. This consists of 1004 Adverse Drug Events from just 439 individuals. I have the full list in my possession but have detailed below what I consider to be the worst ADEs.

Death – 12, Cardiac Arrest – 17, Organ Failure – 11, Kidney Injury – 63, Kidney Impairment – 14, Kidney Failure – 13, Septic Shock – 18, Medication Error – 34, Use in Unapproved Condition – 29, Respiratory Failure – 28, Tachy/Bradyarrythmia – 26
Vascular Disorders – 37.

Safe and Effective Treatments

Long standing treatments that have been around for decades have been hidden and/or banned for public use. UK chemists will not fill doctor’s prescriptions if it is one of these drugs. This is a scandal and has resulted in millions of deaths throughout the world. If HCQ (Hydroxychloroquine) and Ivermectin had been available right from early 2020, this so called pandemic would have been over 2 years ago. Lives would have been saved, the economy would not be on its knees, jobs and businesses would still be up and running and the pandemic would be a distant memory. We would be back to normal with many of us still having our lost loved ones with us.

Safety Record of Ivermectin

Standard doses of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg x 1–2 days) have a nearly unparalleled safety profile historically among medicines as evidenced by the following findings:

• WHO Guidelines: “the majority of side effects are minor and transient”
• Jacques Descotes, Toxicologist and Expert on Safety of Ivermectin: “severe adverse events are unequivocally and exceedingly rare”
• LiverTox Database: Not considered toxic to the liver
• Nephrotox Database: Not considered toxic to the kidney
• PneumoTox: Not considered toxic to the lungs

Safety Record of High Dose Ivermectin

In COVID-19, particularly with regard to the emerging variants of concern, viral loads are higher and viral replication is thought to be prolonged. Given that ivermectin has demonstrated a strong dose-response relationship in terms of viral clearance, higher doses have not only been required, but have demonstrated clinical efficacy. Below are hyperlinked references to numerous studies demonstrating the wide safety profile of high dose ivermectin in COVID and other diseases.

Another important point about Ivermectin, is that it has one of the highest safety records of any drug. The inventors were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2015. 3.7 billion doses have been prescribed since 1987. It can be bought off the shelf in some countries.

COVID-19 Studies

• Randomized controlled trial of ivermectin in COVID using 0.6mg/kg x 5 days reported no differences in side effects.
• Randomized controlled trial, with 3 arms; one arm treated with 1.2 mg/kg x 5 days, and another treated with 6mg/kg x 5 days with no differences in side effects.
• A report by the State Health Minister on 3,000 patients in La Pampa, Argentina who were part of a “test and treat” program were given 6 mg/kg daily x 5 days. Liver function tests and significant side effects were closely monitored and none were reported.
• A report by the Health Minister in Misiones, Argentina, also using 0.6 mg/kg x 5 days with no significant adverse events reported.

FLCCC

If you want to know the truth about the successful treatments for Covid-19 as well as information on how to treat long covid, side effects of the shots and prophylaxis protection, go to the above USA web site. Brave doctors such as Dr Paul Marik
(left) and Dr Pierre Kory, (above) have put this site together for you, your family and friends and the world. Talented and well respected doctors and scientists have all suffered vilification, de-platforming and abuse and many have had their licenses suspended. Their crime? Helping the sick, saving lives and telling the truth. Going
against the narrative propaganda, the MSM, big pharma billionaires and calling out the lies, is not for the faint hearted!

Finding the Truth

It is difficult to find truthful research about Ivermectin because if it were available to everyone from the get go, the injections would be unnecessary. But that wouldn’t suit the pharmaceutical industry who have made an obscene amount of money from the unsafe and ineffective gene therapy treatment.  Fraud and lies are everywhere because of greed, corruption and egregious acts against humanity.

As you can see from the above infographic, Ivermectin has been proven to lower death
rates in studies. Something the one sided narrative and pharmaceutical industry continue
to dispute. So why are they so hell bent on destroying the obvious multifaceted features
of this drug? Is it because Ivermectin has been shown to treat other viruses like flu!

Or perhaps this is the reason:

• European Pharmaceutical Review states “Ivermectin found to suppress tumour
  development”
• Science Direct states “Recently, ivermectin has been reported to inhibit the proliferation of several tumour cells by regulating multiple signalling pathways. This suggests that ivermectin may be an anticancer drug with great potential.”
• Oncology Times states “Ivermectin is safe and inexpensive at roughly $30 a dose, making it attainable for everyone including cancer patients in developing countries”.
• Cancer Treatment Research states “the magic of Ivermectin in Oncology – In laboratory, Ivermectin has been shown to be able to kill cancer cells of many types, such as Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Brain Cancer, Renal Cancer, Leukaemia, AML, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Lung Cancer and many others”.

Don’t take my word for it, search ‘Ivermectin and Cancer’ and see what you find!

This happened in the US, what about UK and other countries?

Watch ALL of this US video, it is frightening!

Is anything like this happening in the UK or other countries? In the US, insurance death rates are up an unprecedented 40%! In the US, schools are given billions of dollars to uphold all mandates, despite the protests of parents and children. In the US, hospitals are given thousands of dollars for each admitted patient. West Virginia for instance is given $471,000 for every patient!

The incentives are obscene!

The monetary incentives for US hospitals to follow the deadly protocols are massive. Is this why no patient advocates are allowed, under the guise of health and safety?

Are they hiding something?

Perhaps they don’t want you to know what’s going on in there! Is this why we aren’t allowed to visit or accompany our relatives in UK hospitals? Are they trying to hide what’s happening to our loved ones? If you live in the US, it’s obvious; you need to keep away from hospitals. Treat yourself and your family at home if you get Covid. Click the image for information on how to treat safely.

What about effective treatments

Why are effective and safe treatments being banned in the UK and Europe? Could it be that ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ cannot be given for an untested, unapproved injection, if safe and effective treatments are available?

Safe and effective drugs have always been available!

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin (IVM) are just two of the many treatments that have always been available. If they had been allowed for treatment, this debacle would have been over with in 2020! and an estimated 500,000 deaths could have been avoided in the US alone.

IVM – A behind the counter drug in Africa

IVM has been prescribed for humans since 1987 and HCQ has been used since the 1960s!
Why do you think so few living in Africa have died. Those living in regions where parasites are a common problem, take IVM regularly, hence Covid-19 deaths are very low. In Nigeria for instance, the death rate for Covid is just 15 per million. In the US it’s 2,724 per million!

The ‘horse paste’ myth

The myth that IVM is just a horse paste for parasites, is put about by ignorant and uninformed ‘fact checkers’ and bought journalists. In fact, the whole of mainstream media (MSM) seems to have been bought by the likes of Bill Gates who has ploughed $319 million into MSM since the pandemic started and up to November 2021.

A lack of integrity by MSM

This lack of knowledge and integrity shows everyone has their price, even if it means killing or damaging the health of innocent people. People only doing their utmost to do the right thing. We have all been lied to and now many have died or are suffering a living hell because of those lies. Lies given out by governments and their agencies, MSM, the WHO, unscrupulous medical professionals and the super rich, with the latter intent on taking from us all that we hold dear.

Paid to Deceive

The paid puppets controlled by the hierarchy, seem to be devoid of scruples and are happy to even lie about scientific facts. This virus which causes Covid-19, is actually a parasite! So what does IVM treat? It treats parasites. Viruses are parasites, that’s official, despite being of a nanometre size. SARS-CoV-2 is just 125 nanometres across including the spikes. See that full stop after the word ‘spikes’? You could get 16 million of these viruses on that one ½ millimetre square full stop, and that’s just one layer! By the way, this is the main reason why masks don’t work!

Being controlled by crimes against humanity

It is downright cruel to forbid relatives’ visitation rights in hospitals. It is tantamount to crimes against humanity when relatives cannot visit their sick or dying loved ones. To just hold their hand, to comfort and support them.  We need to confront hospitals en masse and insist on being given our visitation rights back. The cruelty of these hospital protocols are so damaging to those left behind.  Terrible feelings of guilt and anguish will stay with them for the rest of their lives. But the hierarchy don’t care. They have another agenda!

Atrocious policies of the UK Govt.

It would appear the UK government doesn’t care either with their innumerable partying whilst people were dying in isolation, without the company of their loved ones. Then the bereaved were not allowed to be consoled.

Forever in my memory is the video of a distraught widow sobbing on a single wooden chair. Her relative comes to comfort her and a ‘guard’ shouts at him to go and sit down. We will not forget these atrocities.  They are unforgivable!

Another freedom taken

The hierarchy have taken these rights away from us under the guise of health and safety. If we don’t stand up to this tyranny, hospitals will forever be devoid of visitors and patients will be on their own with no advocates to protect them from drugs and treatments they don’t want or need! We already know that patients have been murdered for money in the US. Where else are these atrocities happening?

9 of the worst lies

Here are 9 of the worst lies that are driving the destruction of our economy and loss of our freedoms. As well as this we are isolated from our loved ones in hospitals and care homes, where they have no advocates to comfort and look out for them. We are living with continual fear and anxiety and being coerced into having unnecessary, untested and unsafe injections.

To add insult to injury we have the threat of permanent mandates and other enforced tyrannical policies. What is also unconscionable is that those who have been damaged by these injections are completely ignored and even vilified, with no medical or financial aid.

This linked video is the basis of this article, you may have already seen it but please watch it again.  bitchute.com/video/tKouXbh3qvOa/

And Now the 9 Lies

1: The PCR test is accurate – Not true. This test is manipulated to give the result the operator wants, using the cycle threshold. Anything over 25 cycles will produce high false positive results. This drives up false Covid-19 cases and increases fear. The majority of tests were and still are, being used at cycle thresholds of over 35 cycles. Dr Kary Mullis, inventor and Nobel prize winner of PCR (polymerase chain reaction) stated it could NOT be used as a diagnostic tool and cannot detect a viral load. Dr Mullis was awarded the Nobel prize for the PCR. Unfortunately he died shortly before the pandemic started. He would have been a fierce dissenter of using this test diagnostically.

2: There are no safe and effective treatments – Not true. This virus is easy to treat with existing drugs, proven to be very safe and very effective over the years. The two most renowned are Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin (IVM) which are both now banned in the UK! This means many have died unnecessarily because of a lack of effective home treatments and in many cases, with no treatments at all!

These safe drugs have been administered to humans for decades, so why are they banned? Ivermectin has been available for human consumption since 1987 and its 2 inventors were awarded the Nobel prize for it. MSM spread the lie that Ivermectin was just a horse wormer to put us off using it. Hydroxychloroquine is an immunomodulatory drug that has been in use for 60 years to treat malaria and autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus and inflammatory arthritis.

3: A lethal virus – This is to induce fear. This virus is very easy to treat! It is similar to a seasonal influenza with 99.97% of people recovering from it. So why are we in an ‘emergency’ situation with such a small percentage of deaths from this virus? More people die in car accidents! Another anomaly is the disappearance of influenza. It’s been absent now for two successive winters. Is it possible it has been mislabeled as Covid to bump up the figures?

By the way, if there is an effective treatment for the virus, the EUA (emergency use authorisation) for these unapproved injections would be unlawful. This is why affective treatments are being banned. If you check the link, you will see one of the conditions for executing an EUA is: “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such serious or life-threatening disease or condition”

4: Asymptomatic (healthy people), can transmit the virus – Not true. People without symptoms will not have a viral load enough to infect others. Those with virus in their airways will know about it and will be at home feeling ill. The asymptomatic lie is to keep you terrified and wary of your friends and neighbours and even bring families into conflict.

5: Masks work – Not true. Masks are pointless because healthy people don’t spread disease. Seeing masks around us every day, reinforces the fear. It is purely a psy-ops tactic to keep everyone terrified. Fear ruins critical thinking and aids social control. Politicians admit that the policy of mask wearing is not about infection, but about a constant reminder to reduce socialisation, increase isolation and maintain a state of fear. People will then easily comply with draconian measures of restrictions, injections and mandates.

6: Lockdowns required to stop transmission – Not true and again, if you’re ill and have symptoms, you will know it and stay at home. Not trusting the public to use common sense and stay home if they feel unwell is an insult to our intelligence. If we come down with flu, (or Covid) we stay at home.

Apart from that, those out and about will be aware of those who appear to be unwell and steer clear of them. This is just a matter of self preservation which we all have in abundance. The main places people become infected are hospitals, care homes and sometimes in the domestic home. This is mainly a disease of institutions. The first ‘lockdown’ didn’t work, so why continue with them? Albert Einstein said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. So how many ‘lockdowns’ have we had up ‘till now?

7: No one has immunity because it’s a novel virus – Not true! There are a number of research papers testing those exposed to SARS in 2003. In one, the donated blood of 23 people who had recovered from SARS in 2003, was shown to have long lasting robust T cell immunity that reacted to the N (nucleocapsid) protein of SARS-CoV-2, after 17 years!  Also found were SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells in individuals with no history of SARS, Covid-19 or any contact with individuals who had SARS and/or Covid-19 (n=37).

Anyone previously infected with any of the other corona viruses have possible T cell immunity for all corona viruses including SARS-CoV-2. There are 7 human corona viruses including 4 of the common cold. The hierarchy know this science. Real scientists have known it for years. It is in my immunology text book! (See Chapter 1 of Basic Immunology).

8: Variants of concern: Viruses mutate, it’s normal. Remember lie No. 7 and T cell immunity between SARS of 2003 and SARS-Cov-2. These two viruses have a genomic difference of around 20%. Even so, the body still recognised SARS-CoV-2 as being a relation of the original SARS.

With variants, the difference between one variant and another of the same virus has, to date, never been more than 0.3%. In other words, our clever bodies will recognise all variants of the same virus. So if you’ve been infected with the virus, any variants from that virus will be detected by your body and will initiate an immune response. Government advisors such as Whitty and Vallance, know this basic scientific information, so why are they lying?

9: Vaccine immunity is superior to natural immunity. This is an unconscionable lie and goes against all known immunological science. Natural immunity is robust and long lasting. 17 years at least according to the research (see lie 7). But research back in 2008 was done on survivors of the 1918 Spanish flu. The researchers collected blood samples from 32 survivors age 91-101 years. This was possible after the virus was resurrected from bodies killed in the outbreak and preserved in the permanently frozen soil of Alaska.

Researchers were able to isolate B cells, the immune cells that incite antibodies. Their tests showed an immune response for the 1918 flu. (Ref: 1918 Flu Antibodies Resurrected From Elderly Survivors – Science Daily (August 18, 2008). Why is the hierarchy spreading this lie? Why are those who have recovered from Covid, still coerced into having the injections? These survivors are more at risk of having ADE (Antibody-dependent Enhancement) also known as Pathogenic Priming or a Cytokine Storm. This induces a dysfunction causing systemic inflammation which can result in multi organ failure and death. This is why a vaccine for corona viruses has never been produced before, because of the dangers and deaths in animal studies.

Remember

We are the 99%, vaccinated or unvaccinated, we must stand together, take back our freedoms, protect our children and grandchildren and stop this tyranny. Do Not Comply.

And Finally

A lawsuit has been instigated and anyone wishing to put their case forward regarding side effects from coerced injections, loss of loved ones from such effects, loss of companies from and/or employment from shutdowns, being illegally fined for exercising your human rights, loss of employment because of mandates etc.. Hammersmith Police Dept. has issued a crime No. 6029679/21. This lawsuit has also been taken to The Hague (ICC) under the number OTP-CR-473/21. If you have information to assist the police enquiry or wish to state your case, please contact Lois Bayliss of Broad Yorkshire Law : loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk

This is a micrograph of a one day old surgical face mask. We used our Scanning Electron Microscope at a magnification of x8,000. The width of this micrograph represents just 0.05mm (1/20th millimetre). To make this minuscule size easier to comprehend, the width of this image is 10 times smaller than any of the full stops on the data bar under the micrograph. At that size 100 of these images could be contained within the whole full stop ie. 10 x 10 = 100;  the full stop is actually square.

Even more minuscule

If a full stop was ½mm square, 4,000 SARS-CoV-2 viruses would fit across it. To cover the whole full stop with just one layer, would take 16,000,000 viruses. Do you really think your mask will protect you? Why do virologists wear a Hazmat suit?

Masks lower your immune system, cause you stress, burden your lungs with excess pathogens and exacerbate any medical problems you have already. As for putting masks on children, I personally think it’s child abuse!

How many pathogens, millions…billions?

Imagine the accumulation of bacteria and other pathogens on the whole of this mask! How many people are continually breathing these back into their lungs. A moist mask is a breeding ground; look at the build-up after just one day, on an area 10x smaller than the width of a full stop!

Be Aware!

Please be aware of the harm wearing a mask can do to your physical and psychological health. The information below gives you more details. If you are uncomfortable or stressed or have any reason, physical or psychological, you are exempt from wearing a mask. Nobody has the right to ask you why you’re not wearing a mask. “I am exempt” is all you need say.

Taken from the www.gov.uk website – face coverings

If you have an age, health or disability reason for not wearing a face covering:

1. You do not routinely need to show any written evidence of this.
2. You do not need show an exemption card.
3. You do not need to seek advice or request a letter from a medical professional about your reason for not wearing a face covering.
4. Some people may feel more comfortable showing something that says they do not have to wear a face covering. This could be in the form of an exemption card, badge or even a home-made sign.
5. Carrying an exemption card or badge is a personal choice. It is not required by law.

More Information on Face Masks (courtesy of Dr Joe Mercola article)

Wearing a face mask increases breathing resistance, and since it makes both inhaling and exhaling more difficult, individuals with pre-existing medical conditions may be at risk of a medical emergency if wearing a face mask.

This includes those with shortness of breath, lung disease, panic attacks, breathing difficulties, chest pain on exertion, cardiovascular disease, fainting spells, claustrophobia, chronic bronchitis, heart problems, asthma, allergies, diabetes, seizures, high blood pressure and those with pacemakers. The impact of wearing a face mask during pregnancy is also wholly unknown.

Face masks can reduce oxygen intake, leading to potentially hazardous oxygen deficiency (hypoxia).

They also cause rapid accumulation of harmful carbon dioxide, which can have significant cognitive and physical impacts. Germany’s first registry. ^13,14 recording the effects mask wearing has on children, has identified 24 physical, psychological and behavioural health issues associated with wearing masks. Recorded symptoms include:

“… irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school/kindergarten (44%), malaise (42%), impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%).”

Of the 25,930 children included in the registry, 29.7% reported feeling short of breath, 26.4% being dizzy and 17.9% were unwilling to move or play. Hundreds more experienced “accelerated respiration, tightness in chest, weakness and short-term impairment of consciousness.”

Wearing a face mask increases your body temperature and physical stress, which could result in an elevated temperature reading that is not related to infection.

All face masks can cause bacterial and fungal infections in the user as warm, moist air accumulates inside the mask. This is the perfect breeding ground for pathogens. This is why disposable medical masks were designed for short-duration, specific-task use only, after which they are supposed to be discarded.

Medical doctors have warned that bacterial pneumonia, facial rashes, fungal infections on the face¹⁵ “mask mouth” (symptoms of which include bad breath, tooth decay and gum inflammation) and candida mouth infections¹⁶ are all on the rise.

A study^17,18 published in the February 2021 issue of the journal Cancer Discovery also found that the presence of microbes in your lungs can worsen lung cancer pathogenesis and can contribute to advanced stage lung cancer. The same types of bacteria, primarily Veillonella, Prevotella, and Streptococcus bacteria, can also be cultivated through prolonged mask wearing. ¹⁹

With extended use, medical masks will begin to break down and release chemicals that are then inhaled. Tiny microfibers are also released, which can cause health problems when inhaled. This hazard was highlighted in a performance study²⁰ being published in the June 2021 issue of Journal of Hazardous Materials.

Your rights

Nobody has the right to mandate you restrict your breathing and cause you potential harm. It must be your decision as to whether or not you wear a face mask. Mandatory wearing of face masks is an affront to civil liberties and can be damaging physically and psychologically. Do not be terrorised or intimidated, it’s your body, your health.

References:

• 1, 2, 3, 4 New York Times April 22, 2021 (Archived)
• 5 Nature Communications November 20, 2020; 11 Article number 5917
• 6 The New York Times April 27, 2021
• 7 Environmental Research February 2021; 193: 110603
• 8 MedRxiv March 3, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.28.20029272
• 9 Nature June 2020; 582(7813):557-560
• 10 Preprints May 29, 2020: 202005464
• 11 Environ Int January 2021; 146: 106255
• 12 Todayville June 2020
• 13 Research Square, 2021; doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-124394/v2
• 14 Montana Daily Gazette, January 25, 2021
• 15 Global Research January 21, 2021
• 16 The Crimson White August 20, 2020
• 17 Cancer Discovery February 2021 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0263
• 18 AZO Life Sciences November 12, 2020
• 19 Global Research February 3, 2021
• 20 Journal of Hazardous Materials June 5, 2021; 411: 124955
• 21 Journal of Orthopaedic Translation July 2018; 14: 57-62
• 22 Newsweek April 6, 2021
• 23 Fox News February 23, 2021
• 24 Prairie Public February 23, 2021
• articles.mercola.com