Monthly Archives: January 2018

CDC – The Vaccine Fraud

Robert De NiroHow many of you have been told by your government, your doctor, the FDA, the CDC, that vaccines are safe and effective?  Of course, the pharmaceutical industry are always touting the safety and efficacy of their products, but that’s to be expected, they’re all about making profits, which is at the top of their priority list.

Where is the science to prove vaccines are safe?

All the authorities that deal with our health as well as the media, news agencies and certain eminent medical professionals, keep telling us that our extensive vaccine program is safe for our children.  Famous people such as Penn and Teller (magicians)
have been paid to tell you, in no uncertain terms, with swearing included, to get your children vaccinated.  Ironic that they are in the business of deceiving and tricking the public!

Perhaps Penn & Teller did the research?

Perhaps Penn and Teller have been privy to research that proves vaccines are safe and efficacious.  I for one would like to see this research and so would a multitude of other people, especially those whose child has been vaccine damaged.  There has been some research done by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) but it turned out to be fraudulent but we’ll get to that later.

VioxxBully tactics by Merck

In an Australian court case regarding the killer drug Vioxx made by Merck, those doctors who criticised the drug were put on a Merck ‘hit list’  containing doctors names labelled “neutralise”, “neutralised” or “discredit” next to them.  An internal memo was also uncovered saying that any doctor who questioned the safety of Vioxx would have to be dealt with.  The email had these chilling words “we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…”   These are the bully tactics that force so many doctors to keep quiet and tow the line, when they see evidence to support an unsafe drug or vaccine.

Good doctors are being hunted

US children have 72 doses of vaccines given to them by the age of 18, and this is likely to go up year on year. Those airing their views about the safety of some of these vaccines, have been ridiculed, vilified, hunted down and struck off the medical register.  These medical professionals are not anti-science, they are not anti-vaccines, they just want research done to prove one way or the other the safety and efficacy of each vaccine that is produced.  Not to be awkward or contrary but to safeguard the health of our children, now and in the future.  These are the medical professionals who put the safety of children first, unlike the pharmaceuticals and government agencies.

I can show you the evidence

I can show you evidence that over 400 peer-reviewed scientific studies and research have been done by independent researchers which put into doubt the safety and efficacy of some vaccines.  These studies have no affiliations to the pharmaceutical industry.

evidenceWhere is their evidence?

Where is the research from the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA, the CDC and other governmental agencies to say to the contrary?  Independent researchers have done their job, how about the pharmaceuticals and the government doing theirs!

Woe betide you if you buck the trend

In many states of the US, it is the law that you must be vaccinated.  Your child can’t go to school unless they have all their vaccinations up to date.  Parents who do not want their child vaccinated have medics knocking at their door with vaccine kits.  Doctors are likely to strike you off their register if you don’t keep your vaccine schedule up to date. What does that say to you?  Does it say that vaccines must be absolutely safe and effective? Otherwise our government would not make vaccinations compulsory, right?  Well lets look at an example:

guinea bissauThe African Study

A study was done and accepted in January 2017.  The lead researcher, Dr Peter Aaby was involved in a vaccination program 30 years previously, in Guinea-Bissau in Africa.  Because of how the program was set up, around half of the children between 3 – 5 months were not vaccinated with the DTP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis). Dr Aaby thought this would be a good opportunity to do a retrospective study to find out how those infants who had the DTP vaccine had faired against those infants of 3 – 5 months who did not have the vaccine.

Conclusion of that study

The results were unexpected and shocking and I give below the conclusions of that study. You can find the full study here:

“DTP was associated with a 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.

It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.”

In appendix A of this study, the researchers brought into doubt the validity of the follow up  figures where those children who had not had their vaccination recorded, were classed as being “unvaccinated”.  This put a bias on the mortality rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, with the unvaccinated group appearing to have a higher mortality rate.  In other words, the data had been manipulated and massaged to make the DTP vaccine appear more effective. This is from Appendix A: “Such procedures give a misleading high mortality rate in the unvaccinated group, and the comparison of DTP-vaccinated survivors and “unvaccinated” children will therefore give a beneficial estimate for DTP”.

who's watchingWho’s watching over our children?

Who’s watching over our children as they go through their lives injected with 16 different vaccines in 72 doses. Our children are being surveilled, aren’t they?  What’s happening today with the US vaccination program? Do we have any surveillance programs monitoring any adverse effects from all these vaccinations?  Could what happened in Africa 30 years ago, be happening right now to our kids.  Is there a system in place to make sure that our children are safe from the effects of all the vaccines mandated in the US today?

Can we trust them?

Do you think our authorities are watching the mandatory program to monitor it’s safety?   Is each child put on a database detailing any adverse reactions they’ve had as they go through the mandatory childhood vaccine schedule?  Are you confident that the FDA, the CDC and other agencies are doing all they can to keep our children safe from vaccine damage?  Are you confident in the research being done to prove the efficacy and safety of all these vaccines?

Prof. Wakefield was trying to do his job!Dr Wakefield

Prof. Wakefield wasn’t confident and look what happened to him.  Remember the Merck email “we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…” This is what happened to this talented medical professional.  He was sought out and destroyed where he lived in the UK.  But it has all backfired for big pharma.  Prof. Wakefield is now a household name in the medical industry.  His story has rocked the world of vaccines and many ordinary people are beginning to realise that they have been duped, deceived, hoodwinked, mislead and who are suffering?  Our beautiful children, our precious future.

Are any of the 16 vaccines causing a similar effect like the MMR vaccine for example?

Only in 2017 did we find out that for the last 30 years we’ve been poisoning children around the world with a DTP vaccine.  How many other vaccines may be causing a similar effect that we don’t realise?  What about the MMR vaccine?

Safety research should be done by the pharmaceutical industry and then thoroughly checked and verified by our health agencies.  But why should big pharma do any research?  They are immune to being sued because of a law passed by Ronald Reagan in 1986. This gives big pharma protection against legal action once their vaccines reach the childhood vaccination schedule.  Who judges which vaccines should be put on this schedule? That question will be answered later and it is unbelievable!side effect

What you’re not told

This image shows some of the side effects put into vaccine inserts which you never see.  Have you ever been given one of the vaccine inserts when your child is having their vaccinations? One of the conditions that stand out, which the industry and its followers says is not caused by vaccines, is autism!  Why is this even mentioned, when it is perported not to be a problem?

If you knew, what would you do?

Why are these possible side effects, admitted by the pharmaceutical industry, not relayed to you before your child is vaccinated.  If this list was shown to you, would you question the risk of vaccinating your child?  What if it is your child that comes down with one of these distressing illnesses?  A side effect that could maim your infant.  A side effect that you will have to fight tooth and nail to get compensation for and if you lose the case, apart from the stress, you will be footing the bill for your child’s care for all their life.  A side effect that in no way shape or form would be a fault of yours or your innocent child.

Ches PowerIn Part 2

In Part 2 of this article, we will look further into the corruption and fraud that has taken place in the name of drugs and vaccines and how our children are being treated when it comes to vaccine damage.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

SIDS preventionSudden Infant Death Syndrome often known by the acronym SIDS must be one of the most devastating events that can happen to a family.  Parents immediately start to put blame on themselves, questioning their behaviour and wondering what they could have done differently.  This is an understandable reaction to this tragedy but with support of family and friends, a parent will hopefully come to realize that nothing could have been done and it’s not their fault.

Protect your baby against SIDS

BUT, and this is a big but, there is something that expectant mothers can do to help protect their unborn child from becoming a victim of SIDS.  This protection is simple and safe and in fact, will protect the expectant mother as well as the child from many kinds of illnesses and conditions, now and in the future.

You should be told!

This is something that should be relayed to you by your medical professional and/or obstetrician but unfortunately, this is often not the case.  This simple preventative measure should be available to all pregnant women.  It is safe, cheap and necessary for the health of mum and baby, not to mention the rest of the family.

Mg BabyWill you take it?

You know what I’m talking about but will you take it or will you take a chance?  Are you pregnant or trying for a baby, if so, this mineral is one of the most important nutrients necessary to keep healthy and protect yourself against the most devastating conditions that afflict mankind.  This is not for just when you’re pregnant, this is for all time.

But let’s get back to SIDS.  What does the research say about this condition?¹  Despite the research that’s been done regarding SIDS, Cerebral Palsy and Preeclampsia and citing Magnesium (Mg) deficiency as exacerbating or causing these serious conditions, little emphasis is given to the mother and child about receiving adequate amounts of this vital alkaline metal.

Temperature control

Beneficial effects of Mg supplementation has been well established for mother and fetal development and for the baby at birth.  This also applies to babies’ first months when SIDS often strikes.  One of the possible causes of SIDS is thermoregulation.²  Temperature control is critical in the baby’s early stages of life.  If the child is deficient in Mg gained from a deficient mother, this regulation can be compromised.  Why is this?  Mg is known to be a babyoverheatingregulator of temperature in the human body.  If you want to take your baby’s temperature, use the area directly under the joint where the arm connects to the shoulder, known as the axilla.  The acceptable axilla temperature range is 36.7 – 37.3°C. (98.06 – 99.14ºF).

Reducing the risks

There is much an expectant mother can do to reduce the risks of problems for her and her child, during pregnancy and for her baby’s first months.  The chances of having Preeclampsia, her baby getting Cerebral Palsy or being struck by SIDS can be drastically reduced by this simple supplement.  Pregnant women are advised to take more Mg than the normal RDA for adult females, but the amounts advised are still too low according to experts.  RDAs range between 300mg – 400mg a day for pregnant women, depending on the source.

Mg from food?

Gaining Mg from food is, of course, the best way, but unfortunately our foods are depleted of Mg in our modern diet due to agricultural practices and junk food.   The bias towards Calcium (Ca) supplementation, which is not matched by Mg, is causing many problems of calcification in the body and excitation of cells resulting in cell death with massive amounts of cardiovascular diseases in the general population.  Mg and Ca must be balanced to work in harmony together.  An excess of Ca is very common, an excess of Mg very rare.

preterm babySuffocation

Apart from temperature control, one of the other risks with SIDS is suffocation.  Up to the early 1990s, mothers were advised to put baby down in the prone position ie. on their tummy.  Research came out indicating that lack of Mg in the new born produced muscle weakness, the weak neck muscles disabling a suffocating infant from moving his head to one side.³ Studies also suggested that low infant birth weight and muscle weakness was exacerbated by low Mg levels in the mother and consequently the fetus.

From the mid 1990s mothers were advised to put babies on their backs.  New studies and reviews confirmed that SIDS deaths were coming down at a remarkable rate around the world and this was attributed to the new directive.

Dr IoannidisOld research

There has been a good amount of Mg research, particularly in the last century and I think the fact the research is old, precludes it from being considered in this modern age.  Just because something was researched years back, does not make it unworthy.  In fact, I would trust older research, more than modern research.  Dr John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine and of Health Research and Policy at Stanford University School of Medicine states “Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong. So why are doctors—to a striking extent—still drawing upon misinformation in their everyday practice?”4

There is so much corruption since Big Pharma and other large consortiums are more controlling of the medical profession.  You can’t be sure if the researcher is affiliated to a drug company or if the researcher/s named, actually did the research!  Research results are known to commonly be ‘massaged’ and drugs rushed through the FDA on the strength of low-grade research often based on bad science.

No SodasLook after yourself

If you make sure you are replete in Mg and that you’re eating a healthy diet with no sodas or junk food, no smoking and nono smoking alcohol, getting gentle exercise and a good night’s sleep, you should be well on your way to having a happy healthy pregnancy and producing a happy and healthy baby.  This site will give you added information on how to protect your child against other hazzards like suffocation, overheating.  Here is a leaflet that they produce which gives great advice on what to do and what not to do.

Why the lack of information?

IMHO, the lack of information about this mineral and other nutrients, lies with the predisposition of the medical profession, to prescribe pharmaceutical drugs in preference to a natural treatments like Mg.  There are exceptions to this lack of knowledge by medics and I list three below:

preeclampsiaPreeclampsia

Mg treatment is given to pregnant women for preeclampsia.  Preeclampsia is a serious condition that occurs in pregnancy.  A woman deficient in Mg is more likely to suffer with this condition.  This is common knowledge by obstetricians and other doctors.  So why don’t medics advise their patients to take a Mg supplement and eat Mg rich foods? This should be standard procedure for the first pre-natal consultation!

AfibAtrial Fibrillation

My husband was treated with intravenous (IV) Mg sulphate when he suffered serious arrhythmia attacks.  These attacks happened quite frequently and he had to be rushed to hospital to have his treatment.   So why was my late husband not given a Mg supplement when first diagnosed with atrial fibrillation?  This, again, should be standard procedure for all patients with this debilitating condition, which my husband died of!

Mg for heartHeart Attack

In some hospitals, IV Mg sulphate is given to patients presenting with heart attack.  So why are we not advised by our cardiologists to make sure our Mg levels are at the optimum?  This simple piece of information would save lives and diminish much distress and anguish!

I am at a loss!

I am at a loss as to why and how this information is not relayed to the population as a whole, a population that is riddled with nutrient deficiencies with Mg being the most vital.  Mg controls hundreds of enzymatic processes. It controls our energy production. It is vital DNAfor DNA and RNA production.  Mg regulates the other key electrolytes, Ca, Sodium (Na) and Potassium (K).  It is essential in protein synthesize and is vital for healthy muscle, including our heart muscle.  It is intimately involved in nerve transmission and is essential for the health of the CNS (central nervous system).

The lack of Mg is the cause of much distress and ill health.  Out of all the nutrients necessary for a healthy body Mg is of paramount importance. Mg is the forgotten mineral, which is to the detriment and impairment of our overall health.

“Magnesium depletion may represent the most frequently unrecognized electrolyte abnormality in clinical practice today..There appears to be as much as an 85 to 95 percent shortfall in the clinical recognition of abnormal serum (blood) magnesium..The role of magnesium in cellular function, both in health and disease, remains largely unknown to medical clinicians.”
-Dr. Robert Whang, MD
“Every known illness is associated with a magnesium deficiency.  Magnesium is the most critical mineral required for electrical stability of every cell in the body.  A magnesium deficiency may be responsible for more diseases than any other nutrient”
-Dr Norman Shealy, M.D., Ph.D. American neurosurgeon

“It is shocking, frankly, how little people know, how little doctors know, about this vital mineral (magnesium).”
-Dr. Jay S. Cohen, MD,

It is vital for everyone

If you are pregnant, thinking of getting pregnant, have just given birth, have a newborn infant.  If you are a man, a woman, a senior, a junior, a teenager, a toddler.  If you are a human, you need this mineral every day of your life.  It is akin to needing water.   Ches

Ches Power Author

  1. Seelig MS “Magnesium in pregnancy: special needs for the adolescent mother.” J Am Coll Nutr, vol. 10, p. 566, 1991
  2. Durlach J Et al., “Magnesium and thermoregulation. 1. Newborn and infant. Is sudden infant death syndrome a magnesium dependent disease of the transition from chemical to physical thermoregulation.” Magnes Res, vol. 4, pp. 137-152, 1991
  3. Caddell JL, Magnesium deficiency promotes muscle weakness, contributing to the risk of sudden infant death (SIDS) in infants sleeping prone. Magnes Res. 2001 Mar; 14(1-2):39-50.
  4. Ioannidis, John P. A. (August 1, 2005). “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”PLoS Medicine 2 (8): e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124ISSN 1549-1277PMC 1182327PMID 16060722.

Digital Pill Approved!

Abilify MyCiteMandatory Vaccines and now this!

In my last post I talked about mandatory vaccines and how the pharmaceuticals are taking over our health, not in a good way.  This post ‘digital pill approved’ informs the reader that the FDA has approved use of a pill which has a tracking sensor inside it to monitor the patient and make sure they don’t skip their medication!  The name – Abilify MyCite (aripiprazole pill with sensor).

Good idea?

This may seem a good idea at first because the patients in question will initially be those needing psychiatric treatment.  This sensor pill is intended to help prevent the patient skipping their medication and the possibility of going into some kind of manic condition which could be dangerous for them or the general public.

Or opening the flood gates

What I don’t like about this initial approval of digital invasive medication is that it opens the flood gates for all other pharmaceuticals to come out with all kinds of technology, some of which we may not want in our bodies. Is this the slippery slope leading to us being overtaken by allopathic medication and procedures which we don’t want and don’t need?

Will it improve medication compliance?shock treatment

But there has been no research showing that this sensor pill will actually improve a psychiatric patients’ medication compliance.  In fact, when a psychiatric patient stops medication they are likely not to be bothered one way or the other.  Anyway, what’s going to happen if the patient is not taking the medication, some sort of reminder?  A remote admonishment from the doctor, a little jolt from the sensor?  How about one of these compliance shock bracelets which is given if a person doesn’t go to the gym?  Am I being flippant?  These bracelets are actually on the market folks!

Press Release

This news was released by a press announcement on November 13th 2017 and below is the summary of that statement:

“FDA approves pill with sensor that digitally tracks if patients have ingested their medication” and in a sub-heading: “New tool for patients taking Abilify”
Mitchell MathisMitchell Mathis MD of FDA

Dr Mitchell Mathis, director of the Division of Psychiatry Products in the FDA’s Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research stated: “Being able to track ingestion of medications prescribed for mental illness may be useful for some patients”.  He continued: “The FDA supports the development and use of new technology in prescription drugs and is committed to working with companies to understand how technology might benefit patients and prescribers.”

Manufacturer of drug is Otsuka Pharmaceuticals

According to the press release the FDA granted the approval of Abilify MyCite to Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The sensor technology and patch are made by Proteus Digital Health.

Andrew Thompson, the chief executive of Proteus Digital Health who make the sensor and patch said that this technology would allow patients “to engage with their care team about their treatment plan in a new way”.  He is evidently already in talks with other pharmaceuticals regarding using this technology for treatments for various chronic conditions!

How does it work?sensor medication

The patient has to wear a patch which transmits information to a smart phone or similar device.  This transmission comes from within the sensor pill inside the patient’s body.  It is supposed to give the patient the ability to track the ingestion of their medication on their phone.  But and this is a big but, the patient’s caregiver or physician can also access this information ‘through a web-based portal’ (with the patient’s permission, of course).

Boxed Warnings

Abilify MyCite (aripiprazole pill with sensor) is available for all kinds of mental treatments such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and depression in adults.  It has plenty of warnings on its information leaflet including a Boxed Warning advising health care professionals that elderly patients with symptoms of dementia type psychosis are at an increased risk of death if medicated with antipsychotic drugs of which this is one.

child suicideIncreased risk of suicidal behaviour

There is also a warning that there may be an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and suicidal behaviour in children and young adults who are taking antidepresssants.  But the safety and efficacy of Abilify MyCite has not been demonstrated in pediatric patients.  Thus these patients must be monitored.  The medication must be given with a medication guide to inform the patient about how the drug should be used and the risks involved.

Side Effects of Abilify

When clinical trials for Abilify were done there were a number of unpleasant side effects that were reported including:

  • Akathisia (uncontrollable body and limb movementspsychotropic meds
  • Anxiety
  • Insomnia
  • Restlessness
  • Dizziness
  • Headaches
  • Constipation
  • Vomiting
  • Nausea
  • Irritation of the skin at the site of the patch
The truth of the matter

As far as the large pharmaceuticals are concerned, non compliance with drug regimes is a widespread problem for them and the general medical fraternity.  Less usage of drugs and products mean less profits and if they can find a way to make a patient ‘comply’ and take their medication regularly as prescribed, all the better for big pharma but not necessarily better for the patient who often has to deal with side effects as well as a drug with low efficacy.

Why do some patients not take their pills?

abilifyThere may be many reasons patients don’t take their medication and it does not concern just those on psychotic drugs.  The poor suffering patient is often having to put up with unbearable side effects and not taking their medication could be a desperate measure to stop unwanted symptoms caused by the drug.  Patients are not stupid, they know what they felt like before taking the drug compared with post pharmaceutical drug administration.  I know of 5 people not taking their medication at thisED present time, because of side effects and all of them have not told their doctor.  ED is a common reason men don’t take their medication.  For those in the US, if you have reason to believe you have had side effects from a drug that has affected your quality of life, then contact a lawyer.  This is one I picked out at random just to give you an idea what they will do.  By the way, I have no affiliation with any lawyers in the US, this is just an example.

We are too trusting

Apart from the downsides already mentioned, what about those patients who are not au fait with what drugs they are taking.  Many people, especially the elderly just take their drugs like good patients and trust their doctor to prescribe safe and effective medication that will do them no harm.

3rd leading cause of death is allopathic medicine

As the 3rd leading cause of death in the US is by allopathic medicine, this faith in our medical practioners is too freely given.  We forget that health professionals are mostly governed by those affiliated to the pharmaceutical industry.  Medication Errors (MEs) are a common cause for iatrogenic adverse events.

digital pillHow long before mandatory medication?

I think there is no doubt that these digital sensor pills, which are obviously going to command a high price, will be seriously touted by the pharmaceuticals.  It is big pharma’s normal practice to give various ‘sweeteners’ to medical practitioners for prescribing their expensive medications in place of what is normally prescribed and I can see vulnerable patients being easy targets and not always knowing what they are ingesting.

What about data security?

There have been many concerns about data security and digital medicine being used coercively.  Those in a hospital environment or living in care homes are particularly exposed and wide open to being used as guinea pigs to test digital systems.  Some would have no idea what was going on.

What about surveillance?watching you

This kind of device could be used for all types of surveillance and believe you me, it will be. Apart from that, having sensors triggered by electromagnetics could be dangerous to health.  Where is the research that proves this would not be the case?

The pitfalls are shocking

This technology will slowly and incidiously creep into our lives.  Before long we will take no notice of having a sensor stuck somewhere in our body.  We could be monitored going to the shops, we could be checked as to how fast we’re driving our car.  Instant tickets, how about that!  We could be checked as to who we are seeing and conversing with.  We could be checked on how many times we visit the bathroom….and other things!  The mind boggles and I don’t like it, what about you?